Jump to content

Introduction to the Reading of Hegel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Monkbot (talk | contribs) at 23:28, 3 November 2024 (Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit
Cover of the first edition
AuthorAlexandre Kojève
Original titleIntroduction à la Lecture de Hegel
TranslatorJames H. Nichols, Jr
LanguageFrench
SubjectGeorg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
Published
  • 1947 (Gallimard, in French)
  • 1969 (Basic Books, in English)
Publication placeFrance
Media typePrint (Hardcover and Paperback)
Pages287 (English edition)
ISBN0-8014-9203-3 (English edition)
LC Class80-66908

Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit (French: Introduction à la Lecture de Hegel) is a 1947 book about Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel by the philosopher Alexandre Kojève, in which the author combines the labor philosophy of Karl Marx with the Being-Toward-Death of Martin Heidegger. Kojève develops many themes that would be fundamental to existentialism and French theory such as the end of history and the Master-Slave Dialectic.

Summary

Kojève argues that Hegel's System needs to be seen as circular and returning to itself. [1] This implies that Hegel's philosophical framework creates a continuous loop of development and self-reflection.

Kojève takes Heidegger's concept of Angst (anxiety) in the face of death and applies it to the fear experienced by the Slave in his initial conflict with the Master.[2] In Hegel's dialectic, the Master-Slave relationship is pivotal. The Master achieves dominance because he is willing to risk his life and confront death, while the Slave, fearing death, submits. This initial act of submission due to the Slave's unwillingness to accept death sets the foundation for their unequal relationship. The Master remains the master because of his fearlessness, and the Slave remains the slave because of his fear.

Influenced by Heidegger's insights into the manner in which Dasein (being-there, a term Heidegger uses to describe human existence) stands before earthly death, Kojève sees man as a fundamentally negative creature. This negativity is not merely a lack or absence but an active force that negates existence through labor and transformation.[3] According to Kojève, it is through labor that the Slave begins to transform the world and, ultimately, himself. This labor is a form of negation of the given reality, a reshaping of the world through human effort and creativity. Therefore, the Slave, despite his initial position of subjugation, engages in a process of self-creation and world-creation, leading to the eventual possibility of overcoming the initial inequality with the Master.

Reception

The philosopher Herbert Marcuse, in a 1960 appendix to Reason and Revolution (first published 1941), writes that the "only major recent development in the interpretation of Hegel's philosophy" is the "postwar revival of Hegel studies in France". Marcuse credits the "new French interpretation" with showing clearly "the inner connection between the idealistic and materialistic dialectic", and lists Kojève's book as one of the key works.[4]

Some have argued that the book is more an elaboration of Kojève's own philosophy rather than a mere commentary on Hegel. For example F. Roger Devlin claims it is like calling Aquinas's Summa Theologica a mere introduction to Aristotle.[5]

Simone de Beauvoir's reading of the book would emphasize the Master-Slave relation between men and women she saw in The Second Sex (1949).[6]

In Jon Stewart's anthology The Hegel Myths and Legends (1996), Introduction to the Reading of Hegel is listed as a work that has propagated "myths" about Hegel.[7] The dismissive view of French Hegel is expressed in Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations by Robert B. Pippin. He writes that Kojève is a "truncated and unsatisfactory jumblings of Hegelian ideas which get a better hearing in the original."[citation needed]

References

  1. ^ Nichols, James H. (2007). Alexandre Kojève: Wisdom at the End of History. p. 34. ISBN 9780742527775.
  2. ^ Kleinberg, Ethan (2005). Generation Existential: Heidegger's Philosophy in France, 1927-1961. pp. 81–83. ISBN 0801473829.
  3. ^ Tønder, Lars; Thomassen, Lasse (2005). Radical Democracy: Politics Between Abundance and Lack. pp. 19–20. ISBN 9780719070440.
  4. ^ Marcuse, Herbert (1970). Reason and Revolution. Boston: Beacon Press. p. 420. ISBN 0-8070-1557-1.
  5. ^ Roger Devlin, F. (2004). Alexandre Kojève and the Outcome of Modern Thought By F. Roger Devlin. p. xiii. ISBN 9780761829591.
  6. ^ Fallaize, Elizabeth (1998). Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader. ISBN 9780415147033.
  7. ^ Stewart, Jon, ed. (1996). The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. p. 382. ISBN 0-8101-1301-5.