User talk:Six and Four

When someone edits the page, and the edit is not constructive, revert the edit and leave a message to the person who made that edit saying that the edit was not constructive. Leave me a message for more information. Amos Han ^Talk 23:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpupettry

Hi Mario

On the talk page of Fellowship of Friends, I offered Wikipedia's best way for how to resolve these disputes (basically WP:RS); sadly, this was basically ignored and very obvious sockpuppetry was resorted to instead, by people who held the high ground in the dispute. This led to the page being unprotected at your request and the edit war kicking off again, as it would when underhand methods are being used.

For that reason, I don't feel able to help with containing the renewed edit war. Dispute resolution when the party who are in the right resort to disrupting Wikipedia is not my forte. You will need to seek help from the various formal and informal dispute resolution facilities that Wikipedia offers. REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ 21:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you've only recently written to Redvers, it could be helpful to wait a little longer and see if he will answer your questions. In order to confirm suspected sockpuppetry, you can post a request here. Remember to provide diffs that indicate the existence of illegal sockpuppetry, as explained in the instructions at the top of the page. Regards, Redux 21:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet

One way of finding out if there are sockpuppets on a page is by taking the request to WP:RFCU. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Library search engine

Dear Mario,

The Library has a search engine at the top of its home page, at Library of Congress. However, I failed at using it, for instance, by feeding it with a Copyright Registration Number. I also tried it by feeding it with "Merchant of Venice" and it lead me to 500 results with various different places containing files quoting this work.

I recommend to use the different resources' links on the right margin. For instance, there is a link to the Copyright Office. Clicking there, you will find a "Search Copyright Records" page. Once there, you can choose among "Books, Music, etc", "Serials" and "Documents."

Regarding the Fellowship of Friends, there are several books you can find there, searching under "Claimant." Good luck.

Regards, Baby Dove 21:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding purpose of the organization, beliefs, predictions and other subjects

Mario Fantoni: In a discussion that arose over the weekend, I remember you said that you were going to "ask the Fellowship's authorities" regarding these delicate subjects, originating many personal opinions in the page. Can you tell us whether you have any news regarding all these affairs? Regards, Baby Dove 21:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FOF

You need to explain here. PS Although this might turn intense, I won't be back in a day or so, so I might not respond for a little while Aeuio 01:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted Coren to see if he was just busy for a short bit or needs someone else to step in. If he does not respond in a day or two, I will offer my assistance as an informal mediator. Vassyana 02:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppeting

Please see FoF talk page as I have proved certain things and request a checkuser on you and Baby Dove. Aeuio 02:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Reb.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Reb.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Reb.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Reb.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]