Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Pariso

Steve Pariso

I'm nominating this page for deletion because I really have no idea what should be done with it. The first three paragraphs are a copyright violation from this page, but the whole article is not (and never was) a copyright violation so it can't be speedy deleted. The article was started by Supernerd2005 (talk · contribs) who has made no contributions outside the Steve Pariso article. Checking special:whatlinkshere/Steve Pariso, I notice that the article is effectively orphaned - the only links in mainspace to it are from place name articles; I only found it while fixing links to a disambiguation page. The name "Steve Pariso" gets only 870 google hits, which is incredibly low for someone who has done work on technology. More importantly, these Google hits don't give me any idea why this person belongs in an encyclopedia - I can't find a special achievement that merits a whole article being created for him. However, I may be wrong - I don't know much about computer marketing. Graham87 07:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no assertation of notability. In fact, the whole things reads like a CV. --Malcolmxl5 08:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A who what? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 12:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CV=curriculum vitae, known in North American English as a Résumé. Graham87 12:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no confirmation of extravagant claims in reliable sources. --Dhartung | Talk 09:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - totally NN. Elmo 11:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:N. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 12:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The fact that it has been extensively edited by IP addresses raises suspicions and, while not reason itself to delete, adds to the effect. Bearian 21:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]