Jump to content

Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll/Account

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rschen7754 (talk | contribs) at 04:45, 1 December 2007 (Before March 2006: feb). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is an account of the tragedy of WP:SRNC.

Purpose

It is hoped that through this experience, the road editors have realized why cooperativity and compromise is important in the editng of roads articles. Also, this will serve to inform newcomers of what happened.

Before February 2006

During the months before SRNC, the main users at WP:USRD, the U.S. Roads WikiProject, were Rschen7754, SPUI, PHenry, JohnnyBGood, Atanamir, Freakofnurture, Northenglish, Gateman1997, Engleman, and Locke Cole. USRD was the project that Rschen7754 founded to connect the state highway WikiProjects that existed.

In late 2005, SPUI moved many articles in Florida from the convention "Florida State Road xx" to "State Road xx (Florida)". He did this in a few other states on the East Coast as well. However, nobody objected to these "mass moves."

February 2006

In early February, SPUI began WP:NC/NH, presenting his proposal to use parentheses for disambiguation in the names of state highway articles. Consensus was mixed in regards to this proposal. A poll towards the end of February revealed that the highway editors were split as to their opinion regarding the matter.

During the final days of February, a debate erupted at Talk:I-95 exit list between SPUI and a few others, including Rschen7754 and MPD01605. The debate was regarding SPUI's redirecting of the article to prevent content forking.

February 28, 2006 marked the beginning of the SRNC war. SPUI made two major changes to California State Route 15. He removed {{routeboxca}}, claiming that it was redundant. In addition to this, he moved this article to State Route 15 (California). Rschen7754 reverted this, citing that there was no consensus for such a move. Thus, SRNC began.

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

Conclusion