Jump to content

Talk:Wilderness therapy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) at 17:16, 27 October 2008 (added WikiProject WPMED <C/Low>). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMedicine C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highly Biased Article

This article does NOT reflect the current thinking in the field. There is a lot of propaganda (especially the "controversy" section which fails to discuss that the linkage to "boot camps" is a media creation. The GAO report was highly biased. Dr adventure (talk) 05:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article!

Especially well referenced, good work! Sam Spade 15:44, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I actually went to two wilderness programs and know many people who have went to wilderness. Either the program has helped them, but they still misbehave or they are just plain pissed. I believe that this article is needs to be reevaluated for it's neutral point. --Bea 15:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbh123 (talkcontribs)