User talk:Triceratops9

October 2007

Please stop moving the page Zoo Tycoon franchise to Zoo Tycoon (series). "Zoo Tycoon franchise" is a more descriptive title, and is more appropriate for an encyclopedia. Plus, what is a 'series'? series if games, a TV series, a series of film? Franchise is better. Leave it. ----- Cuddly Panda (talk · contribs) ^{review me! | join the My Chatroom]} 00:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General Talk

None wiki related talk for me

Zoo Tycoon, Dino Digs and Marine Mania

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zoo Tycoon. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you.

The edits were irrelevant to the article they stated the times the animals were made avaliable which is suitable to a game guide, not wikipedia

Regarding the animal list, may I delete it? I deleted it before because it was unencyclopedic, because Wikipedia is not a game guide or an indiscriminate collection of information, because it is an obvious example of WP:CRUFT and WP:LISTCRUFT, and because it is in a scope more suitably covered by a gaming wiki such as StrategyWiki. Also see sample articles, none of them which make a big list of weapons/characters/items. I am trying to get this game to the status it should achieve, and I hope we can work toward these goals. Cheers, bibliomaniac 1 5 02:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm one person, I don't care either way but if you take it from one you should remove them all in my eyes, but not many people will like it and quite a few will oppose removing it from the articles Triceratops9 (talk) 03:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it. By the way, is it possible for you to take screenshots of Zoo Tycoon? We need a screenshot or two in there. bibliomaniac 1 5 03:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~I can if the disk still works (found it since last edit)~~, what kind of shot would you like? Anything specific? Triceratops9 (talk) 03:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zoo Tycoon

Please don't call people names. It doesn't help your case, and they were probably acting in good-faith. I left a notice explaining why the animal list should be off. bibliomaniac 1 5 00:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got a little carried away there sorry, and I saw that but they don't listen at all, just continue making the same argument Triceratops9 (talk) 00:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look

I'm not Komodo Liker anymore, I have changed, That name was sstupid. 202.151.195.132 (talk) 17:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you stop vandalizing wikipedia and start being constructive I will call you something else, if you continue to vandalize it you will still be called KL, so if you want to be called something else be constructive Triceratops9 (talk) 04:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to be, but they reverted some edits, the smilodon was even Identified as saber tooth cat on the Prehistoric park tv. and the words that u mentioned were reflexes

The more you say komodo lover, the more I create new accounts
the more you say sock puppet, the more I vandalize
and the more you say thylacine, the more I blank up pages

So call me black rhino ranger and call my accounts hand or glove puppets and say tasmanian tiger and I will be constructive. 58.71.169.247 (talk) 03:35, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it, and heres a thought stop vandalizing and come join with a user name that isn't obvious and make a name for yourself as a constructive editor and let everyone forget KL, BRR, and all of your other aliases, if you continue admitting your are BRR or any of your other sockpuppets people will still call you KL, but if your constructive people will have no problem and the fact that you were a vandal may very well be forgotten, as for the name its what its called, thats the name the Tasmanian Tiger or Thyclacine is given and you can't really do anything about that, and if your going to vandalize pages because someone calls an animal by its real name your still KL, BRR and those other names, oh and you do realize if they know your BRR they have to automatically revert your edits, constructive or not Triceratops9 (talk) 23:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry Accusations

Triceratops9, do not accuse of sockpuppetry without evidence. If need be you can file a checkuser request, but no unverified accusations please. MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have dealt with komodo lover as much as I have then you would recognize that this is the same guy, but fine, I know its him though. Triceratops9 (talk) 17:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have never dealt with Komodo Lover, although I do know of his track record. Nonetheless, please do not make any unfounded accusations without any proof. If you are convinced that the user is a sockpuppet, file an RFC instead. MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pic

File:Stokesosaurus painting without glasses.jpg

Proof this strokesosaurus doesn't wear glasses while painting

Here is the pic, too bad you can only see it for a while. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 21:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your still a vandal. Leave the page alone, I don't see a brush in his hand, not good enough because the paint remains on the easel now stop vandalizing the page! Triceratops9 (talk) 22:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He uses his mouth. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 08:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't believe it, I have changed it to say Usually wears glasses so drop it. Triceratops9 (talk) 22:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I doesn't work on mine. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 08:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still don't believe it, I've shown proof it does work and you've shown proof you can't change your settings so stop chaninging the picture on the page! Triceratops9 (talk) 12:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I put everything like animations on high settings. not to mention the grass on the picture. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 11:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine! Just leave it, I already changed the animals facts a while back to clarify the fact that it won't always do it, now please leave it alone. Triceratops9 (talk) 13:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to trust you, but I will this time. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 08:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't trust me then go look for yourself at the article Triceratops9 (talk) 22:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

I'm just pointing out that users are permitted to remove warnings from their talk pages if they wish. See the guidelines on user talk pages. --Sturm 14:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for informing me Triceratops9 (talk)