Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabiana Udenio Gallery
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Allen3 (talk | contribs) at 22:36, 8 August 2005 (VfD processing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 22:36, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
She's cute but I don't believe a gallery of photos is considered encyclopedic. Maybe one or two of these images can be rolled into Fabiana Udenio but there's no need for an article IMO 23skidoo 13:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, agreed jamesgibbon 13:17, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, obviously. Wikipedia is not a repository for images. Binadot 21:57, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Eclipsed 21:59, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. These are all copyvios anyway. — Trilobite (Talk) 22:01, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - mmmm, cuteness. We have commons for image galleries, we don't need this. But, I'll assume Trilobite is correct in that they are copyvios, especially since a bunch of them say WGN in the corner....hmmm.... --Phroziac (talk) 22:13, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually the WGN just means they're frame grabs off TV, and screenshots are OK under fair use, however several of these shots are clearly montages made by vidcap websites, and it's considered bad form to post these. 23skidoo 23:23, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.