Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Rae (musician)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Jason Rae (musician)

Non notable musician- fails WP:BLP1E as famous for one thing- dying. Member of a redlink band; may warrant a mention on his wife's page, but certainly not his own. Prod removed without explanation. J Milburn (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or A case may be able to be made for a brief mention on the article about the band, if the page existed or a new section within Corinne Bailey Rae. Edmund Patrick ( ^confer _work) 20:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Famous relative, not notable himself.Be best (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the Corinne Bailey Rae but keep on the Recent Deaths section. Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 21:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, more than just a relative of a notable person, Rae was a noted saxophonist and a member of the band The Haggis Horns. His death, sadly, also adds to his notability. --Philip Stevens (talk) 21:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have any references suggesting his notability as a saxophonist? J Milburn (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - According to this BBC report on his death. --Philip Stevens (talk) 21:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - that was reporting on his death, not a proper report about the actual band. Unless someone can find an article/review about him (not just the band which some people have been referring to), then this should be deleted. Some famous bands don't even have separate pages for their band members, so I don't see why he should. I'm guessing the sympathy factor is playing a big card here. Feudonym (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redlink band, delete unless someone can find references per above. Izzy007 Talk 21:33, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 21:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I agree with Chandlerjoeyross, add this death to his wife's article. Death does not make someone notable. Raphie (talk) 21:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Philip Stevens. He is notable and his death only adds to his media coverage. Death might not make someone notable, but national (and possibly international) media coverage of his death, in addition to the press attention that he has already received, does. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 22:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This press coverage that no one is showing us... J Milburn (talk) 22:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I did consider the notability of this person before creating the article and I believe that he meets the standards of a wikipedia article because of three good reasons: 1) The story of his death made national news 2) His band, despite not having a page on wiki, are fairly well known and 3) He was the spouse of Corinne Bailey Rae, a reasonably big musician in both the UK and abroad at the moment.—Jkaharper (talk) 22:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect and compact this information into his wife's article. There's nothing to suggest, beyond current news reports which just repeat the same information, that he has any long term notability standalone, and his group that he is a member of seems NN at the moment unless anyone can prove otherwise. If it came down to it though, I'd go for a weak keep over a delete, but merging seems like the best option.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 22:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to wife's article. When the BBC headline is "Bailey Rae's husband dies", that suggests much. --Dhartung | Talk 00:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if his notability can be established and referenced. Otherwise, Merge into his wife's article, and redirect the page there. Paul20070 (talk) 00:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notable as spouse of celebrity.- Gilliam (talk) 01:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Redirect - keeping an article just because he died, is very silly indeed. His band isn't even considered notable so neither should he. Feudonym (talk) 01:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Corinne Bailey Rae (wife)'s page. No brainer. Pluswhich (talk) 03:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
KeepI think it should stay. It meets standards and it was in the news. And the band was know too. Royalrec
- Sources about the band? Why is everyone so terrified of providing sources? J Milburn (talk) 10:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spouse of celebrity, notability does not transfer. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable person before he died, even less notable now. Lugnuts (talk) 09:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep He did some work with The New Mastersounds [1] and I'm a sucker for lesser known saxophonists. That plus marriage might be enough. See Eric Rosse (not a spouse, lover), Janis Gaye, Claude Williams (musician), and a few others. Still those others might be more notable so I'd be okay with a redirect to his wife, hence weakness.--T. Anthony (talk) 15:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly fails WP:MUSIC. If we must then merge and redirect to Corinne Bailey Rae. Jdcooper (talk) 17:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, worked with some known bands,wife notable. My criteria is if someone comes looking, they ought to find it on wikipedia.Disk space is cheap. If non-notable, then no processing time will be used.Chickenboner (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Generally, we stick to the established notability guidelines rather than to the criteria of someone with a grand total of seven edits. J Milburn (talk) 10:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, in typical wikipedian fashion, I hear about this musician's death on Sirius Radio and I find the article tagged for deletion. 76.226.204.233 (talk) 20:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- So, you're saying that you think it should stay because you've heard of it? Wikipedia is not a news service, we're an encyclopedia. J Milburn (talk) 10:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Create a Haggis Horns article, merge with this one. Haggis Horns are currently part of Mark Ronson's band. Ronson is quoted as saying they're the "best horn section in the world". They've played at the Brit Awards. links http://www.futureboogie.com/agency/haggis-horns http://www.brits.co.uk/features/articles/764/ User:joy.discovery.invention
Merge and redirect to 'Corinne Bailey Rae' and 'Haggis Horns' should the latter appear. If he had married an ordinary lass from Aberdeen I doubt he would be notable in his own right. Ben MacDui^Talk/Walk 08:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He's notable! End of story.
- Got any evidence of that? That argument is generally not respected, and for good reason... J Milburn (talk) 10:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please note that the above user is the same one who decided that, rather than actually working to improve the article or arguing in its favour, decided to attack myself and others on the article talk page. J Milburn (talk) 11:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - J Milburn, again I ask that you refrain from your personal attacks against me. You must have a vendetta against me and I find that detrimental to the discussion. The fact that this debate has been continuing shows the notability of Jason Rae. Notability is not solely based on mainstream media attention. James1906
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —Leithp 20:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Normally we encourage articles on the recently dead (see Deaths in 2008 and there are multiple verifiable sources. Thanks, SqueakBox 16:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The story was on the cover of several newspapers, and in almost all of them yesterday. I live in aberdeen and have met Jason's brother(?) in the past. mrkpwnz (talk) 16:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]