Talk:She-Ra

Toys Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

List of Characters

Shouldn't this page feature a list of characters like the He-Man page?

Yes, it probably should. Unfortunately I don't have the knowledge of She-Ra to write it. NB: Please sign your Talk messages by suffixing questions with ~~~~. Thanks. Essexmutant 14:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Etheria

I've created an article on Etheria at Etheria (She-Ra). (There is already an article at Etheria based on something else.) Can people please have a look at it and expand on it where possible. Cheers. Essexmutant 14:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics

Under Affiliations in the Statistics section, it seems "The Great Rebelion" already includes Kowl and Madam Razz. I think naming them individually is a bit redundant.

The Toys Section

This part aught to include the other variations of She-Ra. ie Starburst She-Ra and Bubble Power She-Ra.

 There's also no mention of the minicomics that were included with the figures.

She-Ra and Red Sonja

The He-Man page specifically states that He-Man did NOT come from Conan. Therefore, if She-Ra came from He-Man, she didn't come from Red Sonja. XAlpha 01:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's what the page says, but as of September 07 it hasn't been sourced, so it remains debatable either way. Gunstar hero 20:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episode list

Can anyone help with an episode list? -- Annie D 08:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Split suggestion

The page should be split to differentiate between the character She-Ra and the TV show that she's featured in, just as there are separate articles for He-Man and He-Man and the Masters of the Universe. Annie D 13:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like She-Ra sould be about the character and She-Ra: Princess of Power should be about the series as whole. The same way the He-Man articles are.--NeilEvans 15:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. --DrBat 12:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. There isn't really enough information here to justify a split. Much more has been written about He Man, so it makes sense to have separate articles there. Gunstar hero 20:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rights to She-Ra

At the recent Wizard World in Chicago, the producers said that the reason She-Ra didn't appear in any new series was because another company owned the rights to her. They said that there wasn't much chance of this being resolved any time soon. Algr 18:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2004 figure

So what about that link is spam? We need some source there, and putting "She-Ra figure" into Google, that was the first page I found that was neither a store trying to sell the figure, or a site reposting a press release. Yeah, I put it in badly the first time, but how, exactly, does that constitute link spam? 68.38.200.195 (talk) 06:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't a reliable source being a self-published fan review site by a bunch of college kids. It is not usable as a source, and your re-adding it after the first badly done addition is what resulted it in being called spam. Collectonian (talk) 06:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I get you: I thought you'd just taken it out because I dropped it in so poorly, that's why I checked out some other pages to do a proper reference. Still, the fact remains that we need a source—I haven't been able to find a better one. 68.38.200.195 (talk) 04:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]