Jump to content

Talk:Synthesis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mdd (talk | contribs) at 20:06, 25 June 2008 (Undid revision 221652305 by Gtstricky (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconSystems Disambig‑class
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.
DisambigThis disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This disambiguation page is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page.

Purpose

what it the purpose for synthesizing


What is this user tryng to say? Asking the purpose of the name of this age?

OK this whole thing has been vandalised by some kid, I don't know enough about the subject to fix it but someone should.

Does anyone else think there should be direct mention of synthesis here as described in Bloom's Taxonomy? It is close to the description under philosophical synthesis, except in Bloom's synthesis, the two (or more) elements involved in producing the new element(s) are not necessarily antithetical to each other. M620sound 05:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: Change this to a disambiguation page

I don't think these subjects are related, in any way. (Chemical synthesis, sound synthesis, philosophical synthesis). I think what we're looking for here is a disambiguation page. ----CharlesGillingham 04:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. The "other uses" tag at the top claims, This is an article about the philosophical concept. In fact, it is not. Only two sentences are about philosophy. The bulk of the article is about chemical synthesis and should probably be merged in to that article. This one should be chopped up and replaced with a disambiguation page. Hult041956 02:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article has sat for over three months since CharlesGillingham's suggestion, with little work done to it and no further comment here on the Talk page. Whole sections of it (e.g., Chemical synthesis) are verbatim identical from other articles. It may well be abandoned. It certainly suffers from WP:CFORK and lack of focus. I will be bold and begin transforming this into a disambiguation page. Hult041956 (talk) 23:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]