User talk:I'm Smarter

Hello my fans. I'm I'm Smarter(cool name.)

== June 2008 =I'm great!

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Campbell Brown worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Catgut (talk) 02:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC) Catgut is an odd namme. The recent edit you made to Lord Voldemort has been reverted, as it appears to intentionally introduce incorrect information. Please do not continue to do this; such edits are considered vandalism. Thanks. Catgut (talk) 02:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Abraham Jarvis. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ukexpat (talk) 02:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Shobalobalobadingdong"

A page you created, Shobalobalobadingdong, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 02:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Big Momma's House. ukexpat (talk) 03:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will not remove the final warning. All of your edits so far have been tantamount to vandalism. If you stop and edit constructively you will not be blocked, it's as simple as that. Thank you. And please remember to sign your messages on talk pages. – ukexpat (talk) 03:19, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While it's not vandalism per se, introducing personal opinions into articles, as you did to Nazism, is against guidelines. Maintain a neutral point of view in articles. Failure to do so may also lead to you being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 02:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This edit, however, is vandalism.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —C.Fred (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm Smarter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Request to be Unblocked. Just please unblock me. I'm sorry, I'm so sorry! My feelings took control. If you unblock me, I will never intentionally vandalize again. So unblock me and I will do good. I'm begging you. Just give me another chance, you great selfless people at Wikipedia. I'm sorry, please. Please! Just spare me this one time. I'm crying right now!

Decline reason:

If you're truly penitent, sit out the block and demonstrate your contrition by editing constructively when it expires. — Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your petition to have Daniel Case blocked (diff) does not demonstrate that you "will do good". Do not abuse the privilege of making unblock requests, lest this page may be protected for the duration of your block and/or your block be extended. —C.Fred (talk) 22:55, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser

For your information, a checkuser request has been filed against you, as your actions closely relate to those of a user who has been blocked multiple times for sockpuppetry and general annoyance. You are welcome to comment at the case once your block expires, or below this message beforehand, if you have any questions or concerns. Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 02:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And yet, some wonder why I left.... CWii 2_{(Talk|Contribs)} 03:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, Mr. Blake The Third, just stop. OK? Please. You're pissing us off. No means to be uncivil here, but please. Stop. And stop impersonating CWii. What's the point, I mean, you're just going to get banned anyway! BoL (Talk) 04:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]