Talk:WWE New Year's Revolution

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WWE New Year's Revolution article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article was nominated for deletion on 14/10/2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Professional wrestling List‑class Low‑importance

	WWE New Year's Revolution is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feedback

Here's somewhat of a feedback:

Unlink the dates, per here.
PWWEW.net might be a source problem, might be best to replace them.

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Done. iMatthew (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SRX

Here is my feedback.

- The history only talks about the bouts and matches at the event but nothing about the event's history in general, like it's name or things in that nature, it needs less about the matches and more about it's own history.
- I feel this will get shot down at FLC because the list is too short, what this could be made into however is a good article with more expansion on the prose like a reception section.
- For a thorough example see the FL, WWE No Way Out.

--S_RX 23:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - So do you recommend that I nominate this for FA instead of FL (when it's ready of course). iMatthew (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki

I was coming here to mention the same issue that SRX brought up. In December 2007, WWE One Night Stand was nominated at FLC and failed because it was too short (see Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/WWE One Night Stand). That article's list section was longer than this article's list section, so there is a good chance this one will fail for the same reason. I'm not telling you not to nominate it...I just wanted you to be aware of the precedent. Nikki311 17:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Featured Articles/Lists are much stricter on sources, so it might be best to replace the PWWEW and OWOW. Since they only cited results (I think), SLAM! Wrestling would work as a replacement. Nikki311 17:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Done. Also, should I nominate this for FA instead of FL? iMatthew (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]