User talk:Henrik

Welcome! This is my user talk page. If you want to communicate with me for any reason, especially about pages I have made or edited, or any administrative actions I've performed, feel free to do so here.

I will generally reply here, unless you request otherwise. Please start a new section for new conversations.

Archives

Archive 1 (Jan 2006-Oct 2007)
Archive 2 (Oct 2007-Dec 2007)
Archive 3 (Dec 2007-Feb 2008)
Archive 4 (Feb 2008-May 2008)
Archive 5 (May 2008-Sep 2008)
Archive 6 (Sep 2008-)

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by .

User Talk

I had requested for my usertalk to be deleted and you had stated that userpages are not usually deleted. I had previously gone to delete it but that attempt was denied however they had made it seem that if I waited and tryed for deletion again that it might be granted. I just wanted to know if there was any other reason that you did not grant the deletion request besides the fact that it is a user talk? Thanks. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's just that its the general policy around here that talk pages aren't deleted except in very special circumstances. But you're welcome to blank it, or move the contents to an archive. henrik•talk 18:48, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mygerardromance (talk) 18:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Ballet

Why did you delete my article about The Ballet? I specified their coverage in media and in OUT magazine. 68.197.64.232 (talk) 22:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't my impression they fulfilled any of the criteria in Wikipedia:BAND#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles, and the article included no references or citations of any media coverage (its not enough to say they had coverage, you must substantiate it with a reference). I have nevertheless restored it, to give you a chance to hopefully improve it. I'll take a look at the article again in a week or two. Cheers, henrik•talk 07:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question about edit on IKEA article

Hi! On the article about IKEA, you removed an edit that mentions IKEAFANS.com, citing 'Wikipedia doesn't usually link to fansites'. IKEA is somewhat unique in that it has a HUGE fanatical following around the world. I think that a section on this following and links to the sites, such as IKEAFANS.com, ikeahacker.blogspot.com, ohikea.com, etc. is very valid and appropriate in this case. 71.253.192.33 (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many bands, sports clubs also have huge and fanatical followings. For some examples of their Wikipedia articles see (I'll just take a few random examples) Britney Spears, Madonna (entertainer), New York Yankees, Liverpool_F.C.. You'll see that none of them link to fan sites and that the external links are very few. Madonna for instance has one single link to her IMDB profile. It's not that Wikipedia discount the effort these fans put into their site, but it's just not the proper venue for fan sites to attract attention. henrik•talk 16:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Is it appropriate for these sites to start pages of their own? And if so, can they link to the page for the object of their affections? :D Gardenofdarwin (talk) 04:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent article stats tool glitch

History of the Philippines (1898-1946) (with a hyphen) is a redirect to History of the Philippines (1898–1946) (with a long dash). I thought to check the stats with http://stats.grok.se/, expecting to see the redirect page having fewer hits, representing the portion of the hits on the main article page which went through that redirect. I was surprised to see results (for 200808) showing 5020 hits on the redirect page and 2685 hits on the main page. I'm confused. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 03:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it's not a glitch but results from the technical method of extracting those data from the webserver log. The request went to the redirect page - and that's what stats.grok.se counts - is that correct, Henrik?

@Henrik: Anyway, it would be nice to see the real number of lookups of an article even it goes through a redirect. Do you see a means to provide that type of data? Regards, --Drahkrub (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. It counts the number accesses people have made, and apparently the redirect title is more popular. I agree, it would be good to sum up all the alternative titles articles has. I'll see if I can implement that. henrik•talk 23:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Total page views

Your Wikipedia article traffic statistics should show the total views of a page, for the whole entire time, rather than a selected month. Although...you should still leave the option for the month selection, however, please provide an option to show the total page views. -- IRP ☎ 23:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be good. The reason that it wasn't done like that was because of efficiency issues. henrik•talk 23:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any way to provide the option, or just show it on the bottom of the statistics graph? -- IRP ☎ 23:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. I was planning on doing new stats metrics (for example median views per day) when I got a years worth of data, which would of course also make it easy to show total views. henrik•talk 23:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that'll work. -- IRP ☎ 16:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lawyers' Council on Social Justice

Hi Henrik,

   Thanks for the comment about the name. How do we change the name and would it be better to wait until after the deletion review?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawyerscouncil (talk • contribs) 00:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Always stats...

Hi Henrik, sorry if I bother you with a question someone probably has just asked you. I just wanted to know if you wonderful tool will be updated with sisterprojects stats too. I'm from the Italian wikisource and I'm struggling to find detailed stats about my project, they would be very useful. Thank you for your kindness. --Aubrey (talk) 10:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just glad people find it useful :) The good news is that the stats for all wikimedia projects are already there: If you go to http://stats.grok.se/it.s/200808/Pagina_principale, you'll see the stats for the main page of the italian wikisource. The bad news is that the user interface isn't as friendly as it could be. For now, you have to manipulate the URL directly henrik•talk 11:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I'm in debt :-) Have a nice day, --Aubrey (talk) 12:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing

Hello, I'm the guy that wrote the new section in the Sweden page. I've always had an account, but sometimes I forget to log in:) Swedish pirate (talk) 13:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aha :) That explains it. Still, good work! henrik•talk 13:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Traffic Count

I was looking at this count and it lists hits for days the article did not exist. It has hits for every day this month, but the article has only existed for two day. From reading the other comments on this page, it sounds like people may have tried to go to the page even though it doesn't exist. Is that what's happening, are people typing "kevjumba" into the search box, and that triggers the server log? Thanks - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 17:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably people following internal links, or directly typing the URL. The search box itself probably doesn't trigger any hits though. henrik•talk 08:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Dear Henrik, a great service the wikipedia article traffic statistics is. I am dealing with a corporate wiki service we are develloping to trainning purposes. It would be useful knowing how many times a particular article was visited on a particular day. We´d like building a solution like this on our system. How did you do this? Coul you help us? sincerely, Nevinho (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You don't say which wiki software you use. Mediawiki (which is what wikipedia uses) has an internal view counter, but it is disabled on Wikipedia for performance reasons. As long as you're not a top-10 website in the world, I think the internal view counters would work well for you. For more info, look at the mediawiki documentation. henrik•talk 08:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Felicitaciones por la página sobre Traffic Count

Encuentro este recurso sumamente importante y atractivo, sobre todo porque sirve de guía sobre lo que debe mejorarse de acuerdo con las expectativas de los usuarios de la WP. Gracias. --Fev (talk) 21:56, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias! henrik•talk 08:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Congratulations for this wonderful tool, go ahead, this is great in all respects !!!--Djacnov (talk) 08:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! henrik•talk 08:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia page hit counter.

Good day Henrik

Thanks for your useful hit counter.

I notice that when I searched for the number of hits on EFNMR, I got a very different result than if I searched for Earth's field NMR, even though both searches lead to the same page - due to redirection. 'EFNMR' is redirected to 'Earth's field NMR'.

Having thought about it, I presume that the 'Earth's field NMR' hits include the 'EFNMR' hits, but that 'EFNMR' hits exclude the 'Earth's field NMR'hits.

If this is so, could you please add a note explaining it? GilesW (talk) 20:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, redirects are counted separately in all cases. The total views is the sum of the views on all redirects, which should perhaps be explained more clearly. henrik•talk 08:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN discussion

As a user who contributed to the discussion concerning Koavf (talk · contribs), you're invited to comment at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Specific_Sanctions_-_proposals also. Thanks - Ncmvocalist (talk) 04:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. henrik•talk 08:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October traffic

What about october wikipedia traffic —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitico (talk • contribs) 21:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's up now. henrik•talk 08:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wondering about tracking page hits

Henrik, Someone from the information team sent me a link to http://stats.grok.se as a means of tracking hits. Can you tell me how reliable you think the data there is? Could you email me at steven.gangbar@sunlife.com?

Thanks a lot, Steven —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.94.61.100 (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miroj

I like the advice you gave me. It's really great. I need the MBENZNL page once more or I might put my last saved copy into the sandbox. I have a reason to think that Dutch Wikipedia will greatly appreciate it as I now have several more articles and magazine listings. I have a great belief that (one day) internet credibility will register as not being against the spirit of Wikipedia. A person can indeed contribute far more in virtual space than in real life as it removes the barriers of distance and time. Truly space warping stuff. Miroj (talk) 23:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

page hit count suggestion

As I've already told you, this is one of the greatest idea in Wikipedia. I just want to suggest you an improvement, I don t think it s very difficult to implement: Just under the day number, it would be interesting to add the initial of the day of the week, i.e m=monday, t=tuesday and so on. It would be a hint about when people mostly consult such or such an article or about biases concernening week-end connections and so son. Thanks and regards, --82.226.81.149 (talk) 07:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top Stats History

1) Thanks! 2) Is there history of previous top lists? Meaning http://stats.grok.se/en/top/ shows Most viewed articles in 200808 Can I get for 200807 200806 200805 etc? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.80.134.168 (talk) 10:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AFC "Tool"

Is it ok if I make (or attempt to at least) a derivative version User:Henrik/js/afc-helper.js that is compatible with the current format of WP:AFC? NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 22:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

stats.grok.se

Hi Henrik, i am using your statistics to get an overview how often the articles of our project are viewed. For that i am more interested in the year count then in the monthly statistics. By accident i found that your site is able to offer yearly statistics if the URL is shortened to the year. Currently i can see that the statistics for september are available, but they can not be seen in the statistics for the complete year (eg month vs year). Will this statistic be updated later on, or is it deprecated and not to be used? --87.78.157.38 (talk) 09:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

This is a nice tool to have and I have it sitting quietly in my sidebar for when my curiosity about the popularity of an article is aroused... Do the stats show unique hits or is it a total number? Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question about wikipedia data format

Hi. We are university students in Japan, researching how Wikipedia grows. We found your web site "Wikipedia article traffic statistics"(http://stats.grok.se/) and have a question to you.

The pageview data you use on the site is from "http://dammit.lt/wikistats/", right? We want to know the format of the Wikipedia pageview data.

We downloaded a data file "pagecounts-20080901-000000.gz" and checked it. The data file contains a line "ja %E6%B5%B7%E4%B8%8A%E9%81%8B%E8%B3%83%E4%B8%80%E8%A6%A7 5 82317", for example. We think "ja" means language code and "%E6%B5%B7%E4%B8%8A%E9%81%8B%E8%B3%83%E4%B8%80%E8%A6%A7" means article name. What do "5" and "82317" mean?

Sincerely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 133.27.172.88 (talk) 13:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct with the first two things. Then, the first number means 'page hits', the next (last) number means 'transferred bytes'. --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 01:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The tool thingy

I forgot what it's called, but that tool you made to show how many times your page has been visited is awesome!

Just one thing, does it count how many times I have visited my userpage? Because really, all those visits could just have been me :) ~ ^HJHLady Renegade 02:12, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S - Please reply on my discussion page, and put the message at the top of my talky page. Thanks.

vandalism dweeb

There's some dweeb who has made a couple of really stupid edits on some Batman-related articles. (220.239.33.244). He's getting on my nerves and I have a funny feeling he's gonna create more havoc, but I'm not entirely sure what to do - I'm a kind of new editor, and yeah. I thought telling an administrator would be the best thing to do. ~ ^HJHLady Renegade 11:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One question about the page hits counter

Hi Henrik, Thanks for the really nice counter which I use often and find very helpful! I wanted to ask you something: our article Love dart was started a week ago, on October 3rd of this year. However when I look at the counter results for that article, the counter shows some hits in earlier months, well before the article was even started: Sept 8, Sept 29, Aug 16, July 10th, April 23, even Feb 15. Why is this? Is it just a glitch, or is that due to people searching for an article with that title? Thanks for your time. Could you answer on my talk page if you get a chance? Thanks so much Invertzoo (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have the similar occasion, and I am interpreting that the article "none-existed" has been searched and/or attempted to view "none-existed". Any way, let's wait Henrik answer.--Namazu-tron (talk) 16:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aritcle "EcoCute" and "Ecocute"

Your dedicating site Wikipedia article traffic statistics work well and responds with statistics for both article EcoCute and Ecocute. Then, Click Hyper text word Ecocute of statement "Ecocute has been viewed 423 times in 200810" was clicked, Wikipedia responded that no article for "Ecocute". (EcoCute was created on July 10, 2008.) So, I created new article "Ecocute" to redirect "EcoCute" on October 6, 2008. Please review statistics are responded correctly, but why click Ecocute as above did not redirect to EcoCute" before October 6. Thank you. --Namazu-tron (talk) 10:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC) (Minor changed. --Namazu-tron (talk) 15:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Traffic statistics

Sir, can you add Malayalam Wikipedia to your article traffic statistics?--Abhishek Jacob

See stats.grok.se/ml/200810/... --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 01:08, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article hits glitch

I got the following results from article hits:

Barack_Obama has been viewed 1793218 times in 200809. This article ranked 22 in traffic on en.wikipedia.org. Joe_Biden has been viewed 838647 times in 200809. This article ranked 13 in traffic on en.wikipedia.org.

Which seems counter-intuitive since one has more views than the other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.93.183.78 (talk) 01:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me answer this on behalf of Henrik: The rank position refers to the top 1000 list of August. Maybe change to "once ranked"? --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 01:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stats for all links listed on a page

Tjabatjena! I have used your excellent Wikipedia article traffic statistics, but I would very much like to see month statistics for a list of articles in the same way as "Related changes". Do you have any tips of how that can be done? Hälsningar, --Kr-val (talk) 07:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That kind of feature is already available there. Just request your page(s). Note that we are juggling with huge amounts of data, but maybe it's possible to use Henrik's JSON interface to produce "Related Page Hits" dynamically? --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 01:33, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably be possible, but since you can only request stats for one page at a time, it would be quite slow for anything with more than a handful of "related pages". Mr.Z-man 02:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page viewed before its existence ?

Hello ! I often use your views-counting tool. There is a problem with the page fr:Jean Jacques : it was created on 12 october 2008, and, following the tool, already viewed on 7 october. Perhaps because there exists a page fr:Jean-Jacques ?
Marvoir (talk) 16:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. That just indicates that someone tried to go to the page before it existed, possibly you? It also had two hits in September. 4.233.143.244 (talk) 05:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Curiousity Question

Hi there,

I've been looking into the page visits tool and it's very interesting to me, perhaps even help me in my thesis. Great tool! I've two technical questions, if you have the time:

1. How credible are the visits records, I see some zeros patches here and there ( I read the about).

2. I think I saw visits in a page, somewhere where the visits preceded the first edit. Is that a glitch?

3. An additional question - on what time zone the time of the pvisit is recorded? for example, the Hebrew Wiki page visits are on the time of the English servers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.182.164.69 (talk) 18:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Y —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.106.173 (talk) 22:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. The visits are visits, but they also include bot visits, there is a list of anomalies somewhere.

2. Searches for non-existent pages are dutifully recorded even though the page does not exist. If the page is later created the hits will tend to go up but the stats will include the data from before the page was created.

3. I believe that all times are recorded as UTC on all servers. 4.233.143.244 (talk) 05:52, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Double Thanks! keep up the good work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.106.173 (talk) 16:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XSS on stats.grok.se

Hi there, I've found a possible XSS issue on stats.grok.se

i.e. : http://stats.grok.se/en/200809/<h1>Hi there</h1>

other than that I really like your idea/site. Cheers --Aff123a (talk) 21:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glitch record

http://stats.grok.se/en/200810/Abc-xyz-xyz As testing, I have attempted to search on main page with "Go" for no article "Abc-xyz-xyz" on Oct., 15, 2008. As you see, statistic returned single view on that day. so that it is clear that statistics includes search or search attempt for article regardless that article is exist or not.--Namazu-tron (talk) 10:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

page view statistics

Hi, I would like to know a bit more about page view statistics, for example, is it possible to find out what are the top ranking articles?Arilang1234 (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

click the top button at http://stats.grok.se/ 4.233.143.97 (talk) 05:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly misleading ranking information

http://stats.grok.se/de/200810/J%C3%B6rg_Haider reads today:

Jörg Haider has been viewed 483829 times in 200810. This article ranked 3651 in traffic on de.wikipedia.org.

With half a million views this article is probably somewhere in the top ten in October. I guess the rank 3651 refers to August. This could be explicitly stated to avoid confusion. --Feldkurat Katz (talk) 19:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article counter - again

Just saw your fine article counter - nice work! Just wonder if some improvements would be possible as options in the counter:

Exclude bot hits.
Count hits by unique user (to see how meny users visited the article).
Exclude user (myself).

Hope this would be possible (both technically and to spend the time doing it) so a fine tool would become even better. Prillen (talk) 10:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page view collecting server failure

Hello Henrik,
after contacting Domas, he found out that the disk space of the pagecounts collection server seems to had been filled up. So we lost data between ~13:00 UTC and ~23:00 UTC on October 21 (see report), rest should resync. --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 23:37, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it turned out to be even worse [also Oct 22]: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15177#c7 --Melancholie (talk) 23:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well. There are already a few gaps earlier in the data. Unfortunately there's litte we can do about it (and in the long run, the loss of a few days of statistics isn't really going to do much damage). Thanks for letting me know. henrik•talk 21:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page View Zero?

Could you please let me know how to include the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropology_of_Freedom in the page view counting? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.242.178 (talk) 01:21, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi

can u tell me how to get page view statistics for subpages? --Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu (talk) 17:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have to enter it like this user:Daniel Christensen/The War On Wikipedia. You have to include the username and don't forget the slash. Daniel Christensen (talk) 18:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article traffic stats

It is not updated yet to include yesterday (10/21/08) for some reason, and It is not accurate, i found out, because it doesn't take redirects into account., Ex: Dimensia redirects to RCA Dimensia, but if i typed both into the counter, they would be different. To get an accurate reading, you'd have to add together all the things that redirect to the article. Daniel Christensen (talk) 18:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the first point see #Page_view_collecting_server_failure. --Melancholie (talk) 21:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stats counter

The counter is not updating. By now (10/22/08) 3:08 pm it should have yesterdays (10/21/08) stats. 136.224.168.5 (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read above, #Page_view_collecting_server_failure and even #Article_traffic_stats. ;-) --Melancholie (talk) 21:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PAge counters for other months?

Hi, is it possible to get page counts for other months than october and possibly for a wiki of another language?

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.106.173 (talk) 20:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try the drop down menus at http://stats.grok.se/ (=> http://stats.grok.se/zh/200802/Main_Page) --Melancholie (talk) 21:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant the raw data files for these months and non english wiki... do they exist anywhere? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.106.173 (talk) 07:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of an artical

I was searching for information on my son who I have not had contact with in a very long time. I found an artical had been taken down and was interested in getting a copy of it.

The search was "Nicholas Reyland"

Thank you very much.

Mark Reyland Mark@Creative3d.biz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.60.73.194 (talk) 21:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please explain me why...

I get page view zero for the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropology_of_Freedom ? Is there any way to include it in the page view counting? Or is it another problem??? Thanks for your help!

Do you mean http://stats.grok.se/en/200810/Anthropology_of_Freedom (2008-10?) See also #Page_view_collecting_server_failure. --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 16:03, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robot Blocking Embarassment

Thank you very much for your kind encouragement to contacat you, and all the good work it looks like you are doing!

I have recently contributed five new articles, which is about all I want to do now, and then maintain and update them from time to time. Of course some polish may be done during the next few days.

On Swedish Wikipedia:

1. Roger Jönsson

2. Steve Vigil

On English Wikipedia:

3. Birgit Ridderstedt

4. Jacob Truedson Demitz

5. Wild Side Story (still being built up)

Article 2 has been especially well received by a Swedish admin. who saved it from being quickly rejected.

Sadly, it seems that since yesterday a robot has been put in blocking the articles 4 and 5 and everything in them entirely from being crawled by Google. All this has disappeared from there over night, after it was seen by quite a few visitors yesterday.

This is especially embarrassing to me since Mr. Demitz has supplied us with our main reference sources and been very generous with his time and valuable information, all of which I have independently verified in his files and with others, in writing this and other articles about these subjects.

What if anything can be done about this? EmilEik (talk) 16:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External tools

How about external tools for Wiktionary? Could you make page view statistics and revision history statistics for Wiktionary? -- IRP ☎ 17:26, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

article traffic statistics

Hi, I have seen your tool [1]. I am curious if there is any possibility to find out who visited my User-Page. Is there any possibility? I have tried to put on some java script from public available webcounters but they got "escaped" out. Even links to some 1 pixel sized gif images got escaped out. Can you think of any possibility? --HAH (talk) 19:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for page stats

Very useful & informative EJohn59 (talk) 09:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)EJohn59[reply]