Jump to content

Redemption movement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.22.74.141 (talk) at 03:05, 10 January 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The redemption theory is an American conspiracy theory created by Roger Elvick and marketed as a tax evasion and fraud scheme. The theory claims that when the United States government abandoned the gold standard in 1933, it pledged its citizens as collateral so it could borrow money. According to Elvick, the government creates a fictitious person (straw man) corresponding to each newborn citizen with bank accounts initially holding $630,000. The theory further holds that through obscure procedures under the Uniform Commercial Code, a citizen can "reclaim" the straw man and write checks against its accounts.[1]

Elvick, who had been a spokesman for the Posse Comitatus offshoot Committee of the States, began promoting the theory in the 1980s. He was convicted in 1990 for criminal conspiracy. While incarcerated he was further convicted in another conspiracy.[2] Upon release from prison he restarted the scheme in Ohio, where he was convicted in April 2005 of forgery, extortion and corruption.[3] Other people who have followed Elvick's instructions have also been convicted.[4][5][6][7][8][9] The US Treasury Department has included the "straw man" claim in its list of frivolous positions that incur a penalty when used as the basis for an inaccurate tax return.[10]

Notes

  1. ^ US DOJ News Release 11 September 2006
  2. ^ United States v. Lorenzo, 995 F.2d 1448 (9th Cir. 1993)
  3. ^ Patriots for Profit, Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Report, Summer 2005
  4. ^ United States v. Anderson, 353 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2003)
  5. ^ United States v. Dykstra, 991 F.2d 450 (8th Cir. 1993)
  6. ^ United States v. Hildebrandt, 961 F.2d 116 (8th Cir. 1992)
  7. ^ United States v. Rosnow, 9 F.3d 728 (8th Cir. 1993)
  8. ^ United States v. Salman, No. 05-10093 (9th Cir., July 7, 2008)
  9. ^ United States v. Wiley, 979 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1992)
  10. ^ Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), Administrative Provisions and Judicial Practice Division (2005-04-04). "Rev. Rul. 2005-21". Internal Revenue Service. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)

See also