Talk:2010 Nuclear Security Summit
Appearance
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
International relations Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Title
There is a planned summit in South Korea in 2 years. Would 2010 Nuclear Security Summit be a better title for this article? --BrokenSphereMsg me 23:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- The article for the 2012 summit has been created as well at: Nuclear Security Summit (2012). To me, it's "six of one, half a dozen of another" to have the year at the beginning. Plus, 2010 Nuclear Security Summit is a redirect to this article so it will get people here.
- So, to summarize, we currently have:
- Nuclear Security Summit (2010)
- Nuclear Security Summit (2012)
- My vote is Keep as is. —Diiscool (talk) 00:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)