User talk:Subversified

Elonka

The Elonka Dunin page was mainly written by the subject of the page, who, at the time, was a problem user of the encyclopedia, leading me to inherrently distrust her contributions to the article in general, and to the practice of using her as a source about herself. Specifically, for writing "After the events of September 11th, she helped out with the war on terrorism..." was a MASSIVE abuse of WP:AUTO. You reinserted a similar formation about the war on terrorism, which led me to believe that you had used something on her site, which I consider unreliable, to reabuse WP:AUTO. I see in your recent edit that the offending sentence was left off, which is a good thing. I need to review the current version, but while I look at it, I am reading as follows - "According to Elonka Dunin, Elonka Dunin was born in Santa Monica, California on December 29, 1958" - that's ok. But "According to Elonka Dunin, Elonka Dunin is the best cryptographer on the planet" (for example) would be a violation of WP:AUTO. In cases where aggrandizing information is single-sourced from www.elonka.com, I will remove it, as a violation of WP:V. If you want such information in, it needs to be in the form "According to Dunin, *disputed fact*." Hipocrite - «Talk» 19:07, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion requested

Hiya, since you have some experience with MUDs and Wikipedia policy, could you take a look at something for me? There have been some recent edits to the DragonRealms article which I feel are in violation of WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:BLP. Rather than get into a 3RR situation though, I'd like another opinion. What do you think? Thanks, Elonka 05:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]