Jump to content

User talk:King of Hearts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by King of Hearts (talk | contribs) at 07:51, 22 September 2011 (rm misplaced pre-header material). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Old talk is at /Archive.

Please note that I will usually reply to messages on this page, unless you ask me to respond elsewhere.

Please use the link provided in the blue box above which says "Please leave a new message."
This way, you will be able to give your comment a subject/headline.

If an admin action made by me is more than a year old, you may reverse or modify it without consulting me first. However, I would appreciate being notified after the fact.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Semi-active

Template:Semi-active has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kumioko (talk) 22:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

merging of chemfluence with alagappa college of technology !

Hi ! I don't know why the article Chemfluence was merged . Chemfluence is a national level event held at Anna University , Chennai .Here is the official university page about the event: link 1 , link 2 . And with regard to notability here are the pages describing it : newspaper and here . I think these are enough for verifiable sources and more can be provided upon contact . My e-mail id is (Redacted) --Mbapril14 (talk) 16:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbapril14 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think these sources are (just barely) enough to pass. You may recreate the article by overwriting the redirect. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:11, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CSD G4

For your AfD article pages that for the discussions, were deleted, should they get deleted under G4, such as User:Physics is all gnomes/NPP tutorial/Hyro Da Hero? ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs 15:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IAR. Since G4 prevents me from improving Wikipedia by providing instruction to my pupils, I am free to ignore it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:10, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you! The first admin I could think of!

Could you do me a favor and delete this file? I uploaded it a few months ago under a fair use claim after having not found any free use images of Tondó. One has since surfaced, so not only do we not need the fair use file anymore, it's, to my knowledge, actually against our best interests to have it at all. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 00:12, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it's been done already. Wow, people are fast. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

Edit Filter 390

Hey, could you put edit filter 390 back in service, please? Seems the vandal it was meant for is back. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:31, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to understand this edit rationale

"Just because an image is free doesn't mean we get to use it liberally, regardless of how relevant it is in context."

This was you edit summary to remove the image of Michael Jackson from the Simpsons episode.[1]

I am trying to understand what the rationale behind this edit was, as the summary is self-contradictory. If an image is free, it does mean we can use it liberally, especially in the relevant context (EV). The exemption would be for defamatory usage. Could you explain? - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 17:42, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was a little curious about this myself. -- Scorpion0422 23:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if I wasn't clear. Now that I look at it, grammatically the adverb phrase "regardless of how relevant it is in context" could have modified two different words, leading to either my intended interpretation ("use") or yours ("mean"). What I meant was that there was insufficient EV to justify having a picture a Michael Jackson on a Simpsons episode on which he made a minor cameo. If people saw a picture of Michael Jackson on the Main Page, they would think the article would be substantially related to him, not some random TV episode. In any case, I'm glad Howcheng stepped in and added a suitable image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

Deletion review for Frederick Glaysher

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Frederick Glaysher. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Radon Detection (talk) 22:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/User:Radon_Detection/Frederick_Glaysher

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_May_21

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:King_of_Hearts&oldid=451811310"