Talk:OpenOffice.org
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the OpenOffice.org article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
To-do list for OpenOffice.org:
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
OpenOffice.org is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
|
The contents of the RomanianOffice page were merged into OpenOffice.org on 12 February 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see Error: Invalid time. its history. |
|
|||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
A database management program similar to Microsoft Access.
Whatever that means, it doesn't mean the same thing as
"A spreadsheet similar to Microsoft Excel and Lotus 1-2-3." (Calc)
or
"A word processor similar to Microsoft Word and WordPerfect." (Writer)
So the statement is confusing and inconsistant with the rest of the table.
Calc is used like and as a replacement for Excel. Writer is used like and as a replacement for Word.
Base is not used as an alternative for Access or Framemaker or Crystal Reports. That is because it still has really limited functionality compared to those products. The most important working functionality is as a data connector. Base has got other stuff as well, but it's not very well developed. So Base is not really similar to Microsoft Access, which works as a data connector but is most importantly a report writer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.214.18.240 (talk) 11:33, 18 February 2011
screenshot os
once apache relases aoo 3.4 i think we should change the openoffice screenshots from apache-open-office (aoo) running in ubuntu to aoo running in windows.
my rationale is that aoo is soon to become primarily a windows app. all linux distros have abandoned it and moved to libreoffice, therfore the article should not show aoo running ubuntu because this is misleading and not the most repsentative example of the aoo interface.
what do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123465421jhytwretpo98721654 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
requirements
I suppose that would be nice to add requirements of program depending of version of package &/without Java--Albedo @ 20:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
easter egg
Are the easter eggs in the spreadsheet worth mentioning--Commander v99 (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- No per WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOT. This should be added to any external web page listing cheats, easter eggs and similar stuff. This is an encyclopedia. ;-) mabdul 13:18, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Requested move
It has been proposed in this section that OpenOffice.org be renamed and moved to Apache OpenOffice. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
OpenOffice.org → Apache OpenOffice – The project has been officially renamed: [[1]]. Clconway (talk) 16:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. mabdul 17:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per WP:COMMONNAME, articles titles are determined by the name most commonly used by English language reliable sources; articles titles are not determined by any official name (or renaming, in this case). - SudoGhost 17:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Discussion
- Any additional comments:
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- All unassessed articles
- Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates
- B-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- B-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- B-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles
- B-Class Apple Inc. articles
- Unknown-importance Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles
- High-importance Computing articles
- Unassessed software articles
- Unassessed software articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Computing articles
- Requested moves