Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhu Bajie

Zhu Bajie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Article lacks multiple reliable third party independent sources, as set but in WP:GNG. Notability cannot be met without sufficient citations." "Referencing is not optional" Bonkers The Clown (talk) 13:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Highly notable, but it does need references. I would volunteer to do this, with the caveat that it may take a couple weeks to get to it. Homunculus (duihua) 14:07, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 22:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Highly notable. Per Homunculus above & my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xuanzang (fictional character).John Z (talk) 10:02, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The arguments above seem to be WP:ITSNOTABLE. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Taiwanpedia has an article about him [1] The least that could be done is merge. Siuenti (talk) 21:39, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Highly notable subject. Electric Catfish 21:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are no sources, but I'm satisfied that they exist based on the historic nature this topic. Would appreciate the work from Homunculus. I doubt the article is at risk of being deleted even if it remains in its current state, but its current state is pretty bad. A merge might be a good alternative to improve the quality of the article. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:46, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]