Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God and Evil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Bushranger (talk | contribs) at 20:57, 22 August 2012 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:57, 22 August 2012 by The Bushranger (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 20:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- God and Evil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nonnotable book by a nonnotable "private scholar". WP:COI The page created by the book author. No independent evidence of notability. The two cited reviews are actualy the book foreword, and can hardly be treated as intependent. The page came to my attention when the author started his self-promotion in other wikipedia articles. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:41, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteCompletely non-notable book by non-notable self-promoting author. He has invested money in self publishing and sending almost everyone a copy. He may have gotten a friend to write a review but that does not make the book notable. We do not have an entry on every book that has ever been reviewed. --Jayrav (talk) 04:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. 19:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. 19:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. 19:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Dave.Dunford (talk) 00:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability needs to be demonstrated. It hasn't. First Light (talk) 01:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.