User talk:Cupco
Resource exchange
Hello.Your request was fulfilled.You can find a link to the article/s you requested in the relevant section at WP:RX.Please indicate when you've downloaded successfully and add a resolved tag to your request.Thank you.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 10:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! —Cupco 15:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Would be great to get this article to GA. It is on the list of articles to be translated as part of this project. [1] To get it there we need to make sure we use nearly exclusively review articles or major textbooks from the last 3-5/10 years per WP:MEDRS. Anyway many thanks for your efforts.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 10:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ongoing discussion at Talk:Birth control. —Cupco 22:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Birth control, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Water retention (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed —Cupco 22:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again for a comprehensive and thorough GA review. You caught me on a good cpl days, my first free time for Wikipedia in awhile. I went through the article, esp the history section and corrected the copyvio you noted. I also paraphrased the areas that sounded like close paraphrases themselves. I also added info on tuition and graduation rates as suggested. After I took excerpts from the article and googled them, no outstanding copyvios/close paraphrasing appeared. Feel free to check it anytime now that the majority of concerns are solved. If you have any further, I'd be happy to address them as well Bhockey10 (talk) 20:55, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass \o/ —Cupco 22:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
The following items were reviewed and none were found to support an opinion that a constitutional imparement to a wealth tax was "likely". In some case the full article was not available. Restricting the Legislative Power to Tax in the United States, The Vol 56, 2006 http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/20454556?uid=3739568&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101016396393 POLLOCK v. FARMERS' LOAN & TRUST CO., 157 U.S. 429 (1895) 157 U.S. 429 http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=157&invol=429 1895 Pollock case http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/ccum21&div=22&id=&page= Do we really want a Wealth Tax in America? http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/umialr32&div=11&id=&page= — Preceding unsigned comment added by 248TaxBlend (talk • contribs) 03:57, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- Replied at Talk:Wealth tax#U.S. Constitution, Article 16, Income Tax. —Cupco 04:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 14:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please let me know when you have accessed the article you asked for
I just posted it. User:Churn and change 06:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Got it. —Cupco 07:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)