Jump to content

User talk:Stepheng3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 11:18, 3 January 2013 (Signing comment by 67.137.68.210 - "Articles with toponyms: "). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Links:

Articles with toponyms

As a manner of speaking, articles are used when describing or referring to the Silicon Valley. Its always been "The Silicon Valley", not just Silicon Valley. "Capital of Silicon Valley" isn't accurate. Its "Capital of the Silicon Valley", or "The Capital of Silicon Valley". The article is there, and I know wiki gives deference to the localized manner of speaking (colour v. color, etc). I'll leave it as is for now, but if you can cite sources that say articles aren't necessary when referring to the Silicon Valley, that'd be greatly appreciated. 67.137.68.210 (talk) 09:53, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Until you edited the page, I'd never seen this particular name take an article. On the other hand, I have a book here by David A. Kaplan, The Silicon Boys and their Valley of Dreams (1999), over 300 pages, which mentions Silicon Valley repeatedly and consistently omits the article. What are your sources, if I may ask? —Stepheng3 (talk) 16:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, after visiting the official webpage of the City of San Jose, i concede permanently. Right there in the subheader "Capital of Silicon Valley". Ugh. I went to the wiki page for "San Fernando Valley" and they have articles there. THIS IS WHY I CANT HAVE NICE THINGS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.137.68.210 (talk) 11:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Coord precision

Hi. Ah, I thought about it, whether I was shortened or not and then forgot. This time unfortunately it turned out: copy/paste/forget, instead as usual: copy/paste/shorten :-) It can happen, I thought a lot of other things. Bye --Vhorvat (talk) 18:54, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thanks for the reply. Cheers, —Stepheng3 (talk) 20:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]