Jump to content

Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Cretanforever

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Calliopejen1 (talk | contribs) at 23:52, 16 January 2013 (removed files that have been deleted and don't have commentary here). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

  • {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

  • Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
  • If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place {{subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • After examining an article:
  • replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether problem was found (add {{y}}) or not (add {{n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{y}}.
  • Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)
  • If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Images

  • Examine the images below. For free images:
    • Does the image look non-free? Is it likely the uploader is the copyright holder?
    • Is the image properly licensed and sourced? Be aware of images that say "this image is licensed under X" without specifying who created it.
    • Do a reverse image search using TinEye. Check the license of the source page. Compare the last modified time with the (Commons) upload time.
    • Do a Google image search for phrases that describe the image's contents.
    • See Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion#Addressing suspected copyright infringement on dealing with cases of possible image copyright infringement. There is no need to open a possibly unfree files listing. Administrators may delete images from multiple point infringers presumptively in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Evaluators who are not administrators may section images into a "deletion requested" section for administrator attention.
  • For non-free images, determine whether each image meets our non-free content criteria.
    • Note that Commons does not accept non-free content.
  • Annotate the listing with the action taken, e.g. if the image was tagged no source write "no source"; if the fair use claim is deemed ok you can write "OK fair use".

Background

 Cretanforever

  • Cretanforever (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  • Reported by Kelly hi!
  • I've been cleaning up old images with the deprecated {{No rights reserved}} copyright tag, and last night I kept running across images uploaded by this user. Checking out their upload log, they have uploaded hundreds of images here, many now deleted. They are sourced to a variety of websites and lack evidence of permission. Others are claimed to be {{PD-US}} when they were actually first published in Turkey, which is life+70. The user will probably freak when they see their talk page; I started at the oldest uploads and tagged a bunch before I just got exhausted.
Many of the images originally uploaded here have been transwiki'd to Commons and still lack permission. The user also has a Commons account under the same name.
The user is familiar with the permission process, apparently, because some of their images are tagged with {{PermissionOTRS}}. However, I noticed that the OTRS tag was added by the user themselves in all the particular images I looked at, so it might not be a bad idea to have an OTRS volunteer verify them.
Would welcome any advice on how to proceed. I asked Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs) and they suggested I come here. Kelly hi! 20:58, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution survey

Wikipedia Files

Media 1 through 20

Extended content

Media 21 through 40

Extended content

Media 41 through 60

Media 61 through 80

Media 81 through 91

Wikimedia Commons Files

Media 1 through 20

Media 21 through 40

Media 41 through 60

Media 61 through 80

Media 81 through 100

Media 101 through 120

Media 121 through 140

Media 141 through 160

Media 161 through 180

Media 181 through 200

Media 201 through 220

Media 221 through 240

Media 241 through 260

Media 261 through 280

Media 281 through 300

Media 301 through 320

Media 321 through 340

Media 341 through 360

Media 361 through 365

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/Cretanforever&oldid=533445697"