Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White2
Appearance
- White2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
allmusic & pitchfork reviews are in the article as nominated, tho one URL has now changed [1]. Have another look & consider withdrawing the nom. 78.19.9.121 (talk) 02:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per multiple reviews (Allmusic & Pitchfork); enough to meet WP:NALBUMS. Gong show 19:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, given how both last.fm and Rate Your Music show significant listener engagement, even though it if it has considerably less listens/ratings than their posterior work. The article itself seems well written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.190.31.213 (talk) 21:43, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, the reviews at AMG and Pitchfork are enough to kick this over the WP:GNG in my opinion. Lankiveil (speak to me) 14:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC).