Jump to content

Talk:Media psychology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Justlettersandnumbers (talk | contribs) at 22:40, 12 November 2014 (cclean). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPsychology Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Definitions

Initial definitions are taken from the Media Psychology Research Center (a site maintained by leading researchers in the area(s) of media psychology), and the American Psychological Assocation's Division 46 - Media Psychology

We encourage the participation interested and qualified individuals in the development of a constructive definition of the of the field. --Timothy Wells 12:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Watching while depressed

It is important to note someplace that it is not universally happy/contented people who spend a lot of time watching television/media. And media is pitched to take advantage of people needing an ego boast (but most likely not getting it!). It cries out to be somewhere! Student7 (talk) 23:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The statement removed was:
"McKibben reported that "people watch television when they felt depressed-that the strongest variable predicting that people would watch TV in the evening was that in the afternoon they felt the day was going badly." The report continues, "...watching actually makes us feel more passive, bored, irritable, sad, and lonely.(ref)The Age of Missing Information, page 198, Penguin publishers, 1993, Bill McKibben(end ref)"
McKibben BTW is a recognized. reliable source, taught in college textbooks!
This is a psychological affect of media. How can it be denied? This is one way that people respond to a "media rich" environment. They don't act well at all. An editor may not like that response, but there it is! Student7 (talk) 13:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contributing to Page for Psychology Class

I am interested in helping edit this page. For course credit, I am doing research in various journal articles in regards to this topic. Mostly, I want to elaborate on the definition, add new sections (theoretical perspectives, methodology, and key findings), and correct citations. Please, feel free to add suggestions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamela Peterson (talk • contribs) 03:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article fails to mention "Torches of Freedom"

I feel that "Torches of Freedom" ought to be not only linked to but featured as a simple-to-understand example that is suitable for, say, high-school students. If anyone would be willing to help, I would like to add a section that does include such an example. So, formally, this would mean:

This article shall include the following: (1) an overview, lacking minor details, suitable for a high-school Sophmore, Junior, and/or Senior, or any combination thereof, of one single and complete example of the historical exploitation of media psychology

Anyway, that is the idea, of course that phrase could be appended or modified in any way, but I hope the intent and basic concept is clear. I'll update the article now. 173.239.78.54 (talk) 00:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.apa.org/divisions/div46/amp041.html, http://memforms.apa.org/apa/cli/interest/ethics1.cfm#5_01, and probably elswhere also. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Media_psychology&oldid=633587416"