User talk:Sarah

Thanks

Thanks for formatting. I feel dumb. :( — The King of Kings 07:14 July 08 '06

Anna Svidersky

Thanks for congrats. Re. deleting his edit summary - I didn't realise I had! Next to his name at the top of the article was a link saying "rollback" which I'd not seen before, so I clicked it to see what would happen! It brought up the article, and I didn't realise I'd changed anything. I presume this is the result of being sysopped? I'd be grateful if you could fix it. Yours, newbie admin.... Tyrenius 10:56, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think what happened was that it reverted the edit and the summary, but, although the summary said "fix typo", there are no visible differences between the two edits, so it looked as though the edit hadn't been reverted.[1] I presume rollback automatically reverts both the edit and the summary. If any more strange bottles appear in Wonderland saying "drink me", I shall resist the temptation till I've examined the contents. Tyrenius 11:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS I have now spotted 'protect', 'delete' and 'move'. It's all beginning to make sense! Tyrenius 11:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PPS Sorry to make a mess of your talk page. I misread your first message to me, and thought you were talking about the main article, and that I had somehow reverted an edit summary and not the actual edit. I see you were talking about the talk page, not the article. It all makes sense. (Late night.) Anyhow, if I can be of help as an admin, let me know! Tyrenius 11:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

I've noticed you around, and wasn't sure if you were an admin. I see from the list that you're not, but I think you're suited to being one. A drawback for some people would be only 2,200 edits, but you've been here for 10 months with good edit summary usage and I think your contributions show a sensible and knowledgeable outlook, as well as balanced participation in project space and main name space. I'd be happy to nominate you, if you feel ready and wish it. Tyrenius 13:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would second! --Bhadani 14:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and no hurry. Best to do things properly. Get back to me when/if you wish. Tyrenius 08:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Userpage

I reverted a bit of vandalism by Litch. I just thought you should know so that you can be on the look out. =) Srose (talk) 14:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely. Thanks for the heads-up. I'll have to keep an eye on it. Hope all turns out in your favor - I'm sure it will. =) Srose (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you refrain for now from responding to any provocation from Litch. You have explained as much as you can, and you will end up getting very frustrated. Keep me posted on my talk page. Tyrenius 04:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please Reconsider

Sarah,

I would be most appreciative if you would please reconsider your vote to delete the Grove Street Playhouse page. Significant additional verifiable documentation and information has been added to the page, since you cast your vote. ALthough the page will still need some more work, I believe it now meets Wikipedia's criteria for notability, WP:NOR and WP:RS. Please, take a moment to revisit the page and hopefully you'll reconsider.

Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.149.149.21 (talk • contribs) 15:40, July 11, 2006 (UTC)