Wikipedia:Training/For students/Training feedback
- What I liked
... The videos were useful
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... More interactive tutorials
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I found it helpful --Anavimadumim15 (talk) 18:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sohn.philip (talk) 00:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was easy to follow and the sections were clear, concise and not too long!
- What I didn't like
The tutorial videos and interactive features were not compatible with my tablet. Maybe work on that in the future?
- What was missing
How to stop an indent (i.e. I only want to indent the first sentence and leave the rest of the text normal)
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
On my PC, they were really useful!
--BChung2 (talk) 02:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--PeteLambert (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- The videos were very helpful. I followed the videos pausing along the way to edit my sandbox page
--Rahman437 (talk) 18:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Videos teaching people how to edit an article.
- What I didn't like
More editing skills should be taught at the beginning, e.g. how to insert a picture.
- What was missing
How the editing icons work.
- What was unnecessary
None
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Did not try.
--Daamoy (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It didn't take too long.
- What I didn't like
It was pretty un-stimulating.
- What was missing
Visual content.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Evaregehr (talk) 05:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very detailed training module with good links to videos and tutorials that give a better explanation or allow the user to practice. I like the idea of 5 pillars because it is easy to remember and helps users to better understand what wikipedia is about and what it is not about and how to operate within wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
The videos didn't play until I opened them in youtube, the tutorial was a little frustrating if you accidentally closed it.
- What was missing
I think a better introduction to the coding structure that is used in writing wikipedia articles would be helpful.
- What was unnecessary
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was easy to accidentally close the tutorial and I couldn't figure out how to make it re-launch without going back through the training and then starting the tutorial over. I liked that you could keep trying again until you got it right.
--Glasshn (talk) 22:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The emphasis on a community effort and objectivity.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Helpful, since it displays what the end result should look like. There was a case where I made a mistake and was able to go back and fix it.
--Mr. Senfai (talk) 02:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Interactive modules
- What I didn't like
... Videos
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Easy to follow --Shawn.e.reilly (talk) 03:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Dvine16 (talk) 06:02, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
very comprehensive
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
pretty good
--ModestMoussorgsky (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Interactive excercises, good step-by-step explanations
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
very helpful to understand wikipedia
--Vogel ant789 (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The video tutorials were extremely helpful!
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I really liked the interactive editorial tutorial and thought it was very helpful in teaching me how to make the edits. --Kaylynn Nelson (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Interactive videos, very cool and helpful
...
- What I didn't like
- Had some issues figuring out my sandbox vs the one that shows up in the toolbar at the top
...
- What was missing
- explanation of above issue
...
- What was unnecessary
- N/A
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Excellent!!
...
--Enarowski (talk) 01:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The tutorial is very informational and in an organized fashion. ...
- What I didn't like
... Too long.
- What was missing
...I think there was a good mix of information and videos.
- What was unnecessary
... Too many slides.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Very helpful.
--24.34.157.125 (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...