User talk:43.224.156.72

@Drmies and Mike V: Huh huh, I'm unblocked!!

@Drmies and Mike V: Hey, what do you guys think about the series of music-related encyclopaedic looking articles on testwiki and test2wiki written by users testwiki:Special:Contributions/Lol Pink and test2wiki:Special:Contributions/Pinky Jones. (Examples: Feel Me, Meester Shay) There are simply too many of them! Most of them contain references and don't look like hoaxes or anything, although they have inappropriate images. I think they should be imported into the draftspace here.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 19:33, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

43.224.156.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Mike V: What do you mean, man? This IP is not an open or anonymising proxy at all. See whatismyipaddress.com/ip/43.224.156.72. (It clearly reveals even the location.)

Decline reason:

Irrelevant chatter, proving disruption. Will remove talk page access: please use MySpace for chatting. Drmies (talk) 04:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Mike V: What disruptive editing? You are not willing accept the fact that you made a mistake in thinking I am a proxy. I think to you should go and block yourself. 43.224.156.72 (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've amended the block because the IP you are using is a proxy, however it's not an open proxy as it requires a login. You have been disruptive by telling others inappropriately that they will be blocked and impersonating the Wikimedia Foundation. Mike V • Talk 19:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike V: You're so incompetent. Despite having visited this user page multiple times, you've forgotten to close the unblock request above! 43.224.156.72 (talk) 19:52, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've left the unblock request open so that the new block can be reviewed. If you are not contesting that, you can remove the unblock notice from this page. Mike V • Talk 19:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. KTC (talk) 14:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.