Talk:Joe's Own Editor
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joe's Own Editor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Computing: Software Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
recursive acronym
Isn't this a recursive acronym? Maybe the article should mention that. --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 23:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- idk.... i just assume any 3-4 letter unix program name is a recursive acronym. if it isnt i make one up69.125.110.223 (talk) 14:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Rename
Since Unix is case sensitive the correct name is "joe" (lower case) and the article should be called the name of the file to be consistent with other articles on Unix tools. --MarsRover (talk) 00:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- The problem with that is that on Mediawiki joe equals Joe, and that in turn is an existing disambiguation page that takes precedence. I agree that the most common name is all-lowercase joe, but using the full name for the title seems like the best available compromise. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- I suppose an alternative could be something like Joe (text editor) but I currently have no strong opinion one way or the other. --Tothwolf (talk) 00:23, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- How about joe (text editor). Just put {{lowercase|title=joe (text editor)}} at the top of the article to lowercase the word. --MarsRover (talk) 04:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- With the {{lowercase}} template you don't even have to specify any parameters. It actually just ignores any parameters you pass. --Tothwolf (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- We already have joe (text editor) as an incoming redirect. Using it as the main title doesn't make sense to me - it would be analogous to moving Dwight D. Eisenhower to Eisenhower (U.S. President) - logical at first, but really a kludge - the full name is appropriate for the encyclopedia. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Joe's Own Editor works for me – just throwing the other one out there since it got brought up :)
--Tothwolf (talk) 11:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Joe's Own Editor works for me – just throwing the other one out there since it got brought up :)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Joe's Own Editor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928092856/http://www.linux-magazine.com/w3/issue/06/Joe.pdf to http://www.linux-magazine.com/w3/issue/06/Joe.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050125220656/http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/historic-linux/distributions/sls/1.03/a3/diska3 to http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/historic-linux/distributions/sls/1.03/a3/diska3
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://blog.nielshorn.net/2009/06/older-slackware-versions-vi.html - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/historic-linux/distributions/slackware/1.1.2/ap2/diskap2 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/historic-linux/distributions/suse/early-beta/contents/joe
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)