Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested articles/Natural sciences/Physics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 165.132.24.162 (talk) at 05:20, 24 June 2016 (Quantum mechanics). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Add your request in the most appropriate place below.

Before adding a request please:

Also, when adding a request, please include as much information as possible (such as webpages, articles, or other reference material) so editors can find and distinguish your request from an already-created article.

Physicists

Request an article on Oganesson

  • Template:Req – see [77]
  • Template:Req – a means to count the number of observed particles in interval ranges, as in a histogram of particle energies
  • Template:Req an index of gamma ray emission energies (the kind measured in Gamma spectroscopy). For example, K-40's emission is a broad peak at around 1461keV.
  • Template:Req – apparently commonly used in research in the 1930s; see this Google search
  • Template:Req (H-B) fusion – perhaps see Aneutronic fusion?
  • Template:Req (or Template:Req) as the subject can be difficult for some people.
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req – Similar to NMR but not caused by transverse magnetic RF fields. A method to cause nuclear spin axis precession by acoustic vibrations; see "Nuclear Acoustic Resonance".
  • Template:Req – Calculations of energy released from all types of nuclear reactions (fission, fusion, capture, decay). Part of Nuclear reaction. Uses Nuclear binding energy as the theoretical basis and describes how it is applied in multiple reactions and species. Consolidation from Decay heat, Decay energy, Nuclear reaction#Energy Conservation, and Nuclear fission#Energetics. Finally, discuss the measurements and simulation of complicated models. This article should not discuss practical aspects of harvesting or removing heat from reactions. See "Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering" (PDF).
  • Template:Req – Would be nice for people to explain it, and whether it would be theoretically possible or even efficient; Seems it might just be an imaginary tale of Hollywood
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req – the first portable nuclear reactor, used near Thule Air Base, Greenland for Project Iceworm from 1960 to 1966 by the Army Nuclear Power Program; see this picture (currently redirect)
  • Template:Req – some of Nuclear magnetic moment may be intimidating, but there are many links from there
  • Template:Req – a molecular form of deuterium used in cold fusion reactors (currently redirect to Deuterium)
  • Template:Req – see "'Reactorsaurus' to rip up station". BBC.
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req – SG-III is a laser facility (200kj/48 beams) which is expected to be completed in 2012. [78] [79]
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req a strange, little-known phenomenon on the fringe of understanding linking to parallel universes and such
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req (named after P. H. Eberhard)
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req (currently redirects)
  • Template:Req or Estakhr's Constant
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req (currently redirect to Heim theory)
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req Electrons are assumed to have the same size orbits as without that approximation and have the same amount of attractive force to the nuclei so the electrons must be orbiting infinitely fast and so that approximation can't be applied to relativistic quantum mechanics. Furthermore, since they're assumed to be massless, the Planck constant is also assumed to be zero with nuclei behaving only like particles and just electrons behaving like waves. There are no photons in that approximation because it's nonrelativistic.
  • Template:Req [104], Leonard Susskind uses it in this lecture
  • Template:Req (PQCM)
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req (QGD)
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req (see *Quaternion and *Hilbert space)
  • Template:Req It is related to Perturbation theory.
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req) like Simplified quantum mechanics except that the speed of light is finite, the fine-structure constant is what it is in real life; the ratio of an electron mass to a the hydrogan nucleas mass is what it is in real life (protons don't exist in Simplified quantum mechanics (relativity) because in Simplified quantum mechanics (relativity), a more massive nucleas is infinitely small and indestructable and so does not contain protons and neutrons but has the same mass as the nucleas has in real life); photons exist; there is such a thing as a magnetic field; and the planck constant is non-zero. Also, in Simplified quantum mechanics (relativity), since electrons aren't massless, nuclei don't completely bahave like particles. Electrons can't be massless in Simplified quantum mechanics (relativity) because they are travelling at a small fraction of the speed of light and since they're not travelling infinitely fast, they can't have a zero mass in order to make an orbit around a nucleas at that finite speed with their finite attractive force to the nucleas. In otherwords, there is no such thing as very simplified quantum mechanics (relativity). In that article, the theory should only be called 'Simplified quantum mechanics (relativity)' in the title but everywhere else in the article, it should be referred to as 'simplified quantum mechanics'.
  • Template:Req like Very simplified quantum mechanics except that electrons are not massless and so nuclei don't only behave like particles. It's also a nonrelativistic quantum mechanics so the fine-structure constant is also zero in that theory but the Planck constant is nonzero. Electrons and nuclei are also infinitely small indestructable particles in that theory.
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req
  • Template:Req As a section in Quantum entanglement
  • Template:Req – a type of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics where electrons and nuclei are both assumed to be infinitely small indivisable partcles that are stable over an infinitely long time. Electrons are assumed to be completely massless and therefore behave like waves and nuclei are assumed to behave completely like particles and not at all like waves. They are also assumed to be moving infinitely fast due to the combination of their masslessness and their nonzero attraction to nuclei in orbit but their speed is assumed to be infinitely smaller than c, that is, the dimensionless fine-structure constant is assumed to be 0. Since the fine-structure constant is defined in terms of h and h is 0 in very simplified quantum mechanics and you can't divide by 0, it must instead be defined in terms of another formula that can be derived from that formula but doesn't have h appearing anywhere in it. The article should fully describe all the laws that dictate the probability density of a nucleus being in a given position at a given future time based on all past positions of all nuclei in the universe at all past times and all past wave functions. Simplified quantum mechanics does not one speck of discussing nuclear chemistry. It also assumes there's no such thing as gravity and that there are no particles other than electrons and nuclei nor are there any neutrinos. Because it's nonrelativistic, there's assumed to be such a thing as an electric filed but no such thing as a magnetic field and orbits of any size are completely stable due to the inability to spiral in emitting an electromagnetic wave and so photons are assumed not to exist either. Although very simplified quantum mechanics makes a lot of approximations like infinitely small particles, what I described, and a zero cosmological constant, it does not however neglect electron-electron repulsion terms in a wave function. The article should not use a notation that people who never heard of quantum mechanics would be unable to find out precisely what meant in that article or click a link to another Wikipedia article to have it fully described what it means.
  • Template:Req (imagination;visions)/ adj. to generative dynamics; see [105] for dispositions quantative qualification all engramic behavior is dispositional
  • Template:Req

Quantum information and computation

Other physics terms

Requests listed in this section may belong somewhere else. Please help by moving them to a suitable location.

References

  1. ^ Raĭzer, Y.P., 1980. Optical discharges. Physics-Uspekhi, 23(11), pp.789-806.
  2. ^ Generalov, N.A., Zimakov, V.P., Kozlov, G.I., Masyukov, V.A. and Raizer, Y.P., 1970. Continuous optical discharge. ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu, 11, p.447.
  3. ^ BAPS.2013.DFD.R8.4[1]
  4. ^ BPAS.2015.MAR.V1.285[2]
  5. ^ BAPS.2015.APR.T1.26[3]