Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SapphireOne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RbABC (talk | contribs) at 15:34, 29 July 2016 (Comments by other users). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

JohnAdamsSapphireOne

This case was moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JohnAdamsSapphireOne from SapphireOne (talk · contribs). Future cases should be placed there.


28 July 2016

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

New user has re-created an article (SapphireOne) that has been repeatedly deleted under WP:A7 and WP:A11 - the original author has been indefinitely blocked and this author has posted the article in an identical format. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Additionally, our editor doesn't seem to grasp the concept of copyright either - on both occasions I've deleted the article its been created by copying and pasting information verbatim from copyrighted sources. At the rate they are going these accounts are going to end up indef-blocked on WP:COPYVIO. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I flagged the article for CSD yesterday because I was suspicious about its significance. I later removed the tag because I thought I had mistakenly applied it; the editor arrogantly challenged my CSD request asking to "enlighten [them]" as to why it should be removed. I now see that this article has been repeatedly created and support a block, as "repeated uploading of copyrighted material" is listed on WP:VANDAL. Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 05:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me guys. This kind of personal harassment is not right. I except some good judgement from Wikipedia administrator. Thanks _ User:RbABC , 30 July 2016

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments