User talk:HappyValleyEditor

Editing at AFD

Hi, it depends on the editing - large deletions are controversial as is removal of references especially when they are RS( not accusing you of that ). My opinion is that the creater of the article should be allowed the time at AFD to edit it themselves.thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions are fine, but the policy/guideline is clear. My edits on that article were correct. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 21:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

indefinite one-way IBAN for User:Maybeparaphrased

The above user is indefinitely banned from any interaction with you per community consensus here. If he violates the IBAN, report it to ANI.

I hope this remedy helps you decide to return to editing. Harassment is not to be tolerated, and I'm sorry you had to go through so much to get it stopped. Katie^talk 22:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you do decide to come back, it would be a good idea to I-ban yourself from that editor. Best, ~Awilley (talk) 06:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Come back!

please come back! We need good editors like you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePlatypusofDoom's Sock (talk • contribs) 21:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded! ~ Erick Shepherd • (Talk) • 01:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User group: New Page Reviewr

Hello HappyValleyEditor.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]