Talk:Trump (card games)
Board and table games Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Contract bridge Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Redirect
User:162.83.158.202 has reverted the redirect back to an article, with the edit saying that Knock-out Whist is not the same as this game. However, searching "trump card game" yields no good results and [1] says Trumps the card game is Knock-out Whist. Can you provide a source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ColourBurst (talk • contribs) 23:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Trump is different from Trumps (note the s). I'm working on finding external sources for Trump but in the meantime, I'd like to continue building the wikipedia page for it with the rules I know. You're welcome to create a 'Trumps' page and have that redirect to Knock-out Whist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattiyeh (talk • contribs) 02:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- I can confirm that there is a middle-eastern game called pronounced 'tarneeb' in english, which directed me here. I hope the above-mentioned completes the article! --Xtcrider 03:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Revise or Delete
This article is very possibly the ugliest, most confused pile of dung I have every encountered (though not the biggest—that would go to the article "2000s"). I frankly doubt that there are any authentic references to this game. My suspicion is that, when they were a child, someone was taught bridge or another game that involves trump cards, and that they put together this article from their foggy and inaccurate memories. I'm going to delete this or scour it nearly clean if no one fixes it in the next week or so. Unschool 02:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- The German, Danish, Norwegian, Esperanto and Swedish articles on trump cards all link here, and since no such article on trumps actually existed, I put one here. While there may be game sometimes called trump (but usually other names) we shouldn't confuse people over a mega obscurity. 2005 02:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- we shouldn't confuse people over a mega obscurity
Needs a more general description/explaination
For those of us who don't play card games, but are interested in the phenomenon, would be great. I finally wanted to look this up, because of a Twain quote:
Tell the truth or trump - but get the trick.
-- Mark Twain, _Pudd'n'head Wilson_ (1894)
And I've seen references to it in the Amber series... So I'd like more details on what it's suppossed to mean, so that I can get where the authors are taking off from.
~ender 2007-04-15 09:50:PM MST —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.167.217.162 (talk) 16:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
It's impressive how good a job this article currently does at NOT explaining what a trump is. 130.89.228.82 (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Text From Other Articles
Many trick-taking games contain a trump suit. Cards in the trump suit outrank all others. If trump is played to a trick led in another suit, the highest card of the trump suit (rather than the highest card in the led suit) wins.
Trump may be static or dynamic. Static trump is featured in Spades, where the spade suit is always trump, as well as many tarock games where a separate trump suit (in addition to the other four) is featured. When trump is dynamic, as in Contract Bridge, it is usually declared by the winner of the auction, the right to choose trump being an incentive for players to bid; or in some games, such as Oh Hell and the original form of Whist, it is determined randomly by exposing a card (in this case it's as if the trump was static, but it adds some psychological variety to the game and makes it more difficult to cheat while dealing the cards if the trump suit is only chosen in the end of the deal).
In some games, certain special cards are high trumps regardless of the actual trump suit. For example, in skat, jacks are the highest four trumps.
Some games have more than one trump suit, such as Stortok, in which there are two trumps, with one superseding the other.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.167.217.162 (talk) 16:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
See also
I like how at the bottom of this article it links to race card. --208.114.177.246 (talk) 01:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was see talk:Trump (disambiguation).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Trump (card games) → Trump — Per discussion at Talk:Trump: The card game meaning of the term is the original and most common one. Hans Adler 23:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
unrelated metaphorical use
The line that reads "She's not really running for president, she's pulling a Trump. She's pretending to consider it for fame, money, and her reality show." is completely unrelated to the word "trump", it seems more like a joke on Donald Trump. I would remove it, but can't. 89.154.91.60 (talk) 16:18, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Got it 66.41.128.154 (talk) 04:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Requested move 6 March 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not Moved Mike Cline (talk) 13:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
– To reverse this 2010 RM. The attention this page (by either page views or vandalism) is because of Donald Trump. Because of this, this article doesn't seem to be the primary topic anymore. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 00:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Even if his campaign fails, Donald Trump will continue to be a viable meaning of "Trump" for the time being. ONR (talk) 06:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Old Naval Rooftops (talk • contribs)
- Support. By the same token, Donald Trump should have a prominent place on the dab page. As things are the article is hidden away in Trump (surname). —Xezbeth (talk) 10:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - the card game term is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC with respect to long-term significance, as it has "substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term". If Donald Trump goes on to become president, I would probably reverse this stance, but as things stand now, the long-term significance of the card game term trumps Donald's short term notoriety. — Amakuru (talk) 11:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per Amakuru. While Donald Trump may be the primary topic of "Trump" now, what happens after a few years? sst✈ 14:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- It can be moved again in a few years. — AjaxSmack 02:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose for the reasons well-stated by Amakuru. At the moment Donald Trump is no more notable than he has been in the past. Maybe if he eventually holds a public office then there will be good reason for this move. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 15:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose, to be re-evaluated if Trump becomes President. Gore does not redirect to Al Gore, nor does Dole redirect to Bob Dole. It is appropriate to have a direct hatnote, as this article currently does. StAnselm (talk) 02:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose by analogy with Apple. The generic is primary, if anything is. Dicklyon (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per the more lasting significance of the concept. That said, if Donald gets the presidency this fall, that might be sufficiently lasting – and earth-shaking – to merit revisiting this. ╠╣uw [talk] 10:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per @Dicklyon; also see Java. Goldenshimmer (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2016
This edit request to Trump has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the leading hatnote to "This article is about the card trick. For the businessman and 2016 U.S. presidential candidate, see Donald Trump. For other uses, see Trump (disambiguation).".
122.61.62.10 (talk) 07:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Why? StAnselm (talk) 08:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Done st170etalk 21:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Bumping the earlier question:
- Why?
- The previous hatnote was perfectly functional. This adds additional and incorrect verbiage, since a "trump" is not a card trick.--NapoliRoma (talk) 21:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Request
Move page to Trump (card games); make Trump a redirect to Donald Trump. Trump is now going to be the 45th President of America. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 07:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- oppose, we didn't redirect Bush, did we? The common noun still counts as primary. Arguably (as in Bush) make Trump the disambiguation page. --dab (𒁳) 08:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 9 November 2016
The request to rename this article to Trump (card games) has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Trump → Trump (card games) – Donald Trump is now President-elect of the United States, convert Trump to a redirect per above. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose (as above), less "triumphalism" please. We did not redirect Bush. --dab (𒁳) 09:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose do we seriously want to put a hat-note on the new president's article saying for|the game|Trump (card games)? As Dbachmann above notes, we do not redirect Bush and Carter is a dab page. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- However, yes, agree with alternative proposal per three below in moving Trump (disambiguation) to Trump, it should have been there anyway. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. "Bush" is a flawed example as two POTUSes were named Bush, and many other significant topics are named "Carter", unlike Trump. SSTflyer 10:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- "Trump" is going to be the "primary" topic in terms of sheer number of page requests for, variously, Donald Trump, his administration, his presidency (etc.), over the next years. I grant you as much, but I am not convinced this is enough for "WP:PRIMARYTOPIC". But I would be amenable to supporting a motion to make Trump the disambiguation page (as with Bush) as a compromise. --dab (𒁳) 10:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support DAB. Opposers above refer to "trump" having more long-term significance, and several cite that he hasn't won the presidency. Well, now Trump himself has long-term significance. Make the primary topic the DAB page. Nohomersryan (talk) 12:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support alternative proposal: Trump should be the disambiguation page. Like someone said above, no-one suggested that Bush should redirect to any of the presidents. MrStoofer (talk) 13:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support - the great majority of readers searching for "Trump" can be assumed to want to read about the president. -- Кукамонга (talk) 14:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support. By no measure is this the primary topic compared to the President-elect, various Trump Organization topics, and even the Major Arcana or trumps.--Cúchullain t/c 15:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)