User talk:Veneetieb

Veneetieb, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Veneetieb! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: School Communication Arts (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Basically, it's advertising. The tone is not suitable for an encyclopedia . The wording throughout is slanted towards promotion.

It's wordy and elaborate, which is appropriate for persuasive prose, but not descriptive prose. Consider: Some agencies donate money to fund scholarships. Some donate time. Some do both. Consequently, the students have a large network of mentors. One third of these same students benefit from industry funded scholarships.

with "Various agencies donate staff time to serve as mentors, resulting in a large network of mentors. Agencies also donate money for scholarships, and one-third of the students have agency scholarships.

I could simplify this even further.

Writing of interest only to the current or prospective students staff or alumni is Promotional writing; who but the students would care about the cute names for the various annual classes? Who but they would care about the multiple student awards?

The school is probably notable,though it does not award degrees. Try again to write as plain-spoken an article as possible. Include only one social media site. Don't cite primarily the school's own publications. And in WP a listing of notable alumni includes only tose who have WP articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:School Communication Arts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 03:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: School Communication Arts (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still unconvincing and it would specifically need the best amount of major independent news, not announcements or notices.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:School Communication Arts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]