User talk:24.55.93.83

Great job!

Hi! Thank you so much for the cleanup at Allow Me to Reintroduce Myself! You really caught some mistakes that I missed. You might want to create an account. Check this out for some info on why you should create an account. Once again thank you for your productive contributions to Wikipedia! Regards, Jith12 (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 123.136.111.63 (talk) 02:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Per the MOS (MOS:NUMBERSIGN), "No." is just as valid a term for "number". There is no reason to change it. Additionally, in regards to your recent edits to Flume song articles, it is not necessary to always specify "number" in front of an actual figure if it is obvious from context what is being talked about, especially in a sentence that reads "reached its peak of 57". Ss112 23:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at What So Not.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is not required or necessary to change "No." to "number". This is allowable per the MOS. Don't just ignore what other editors tell you. Ss112 01:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by introducing incorrect information, as you did with this edit to Adrian Marcel. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Not an Apology

Per your edits to Not an Apology, you need to read MOS:DATERANGE. Years are spelt out in full when space is not an issue, as in most infoboxes if the years are the only thing in the recorded parameter. Also, you de-capitalised the I in "Is" in a song title, which is against MOS:CT. Ss112 07:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual Healing

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Sexual Healing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Still changing "No." to "number" even after being told this isn't a necessary change to make. Please don't ignore what editors tell you. Ss112 00:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changing everything to templates

You do not need to change every single list in an infobox on Wikipedia to templates. I don't know if you realise this, but a lot of your edits constitute minor, unnecessary changes that really don't make any improvement to the page, for instance de-capitalising the first letter of duration or birth templates. Why bother doing this? It makes no difference. Also, I really strongly suggest that you register for an account to make yourself accountable for your edits, as you have gotten into trouble for incremental edits to things like genre before, instead of using an anonymous IP address. Ss112 03:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use other accounts to try to force changes on pages, as you did at A Bay Bay. If I were you, I'd stop using other accounts, unless you want a sockpuppet investigation opened on you. It is against WP:Sockpuppeting to deliberately use accounts in this way. Ss112 03:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jax Jones. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You're receiving a higher-level warning, as you have added unsourced genres and been warned before. Ss112 23:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do you really think around 25 edits to a page (Jax Jones) over the course of 50 minutes is necessary? Are you trying to go for some IP address edit record here? IP addresses don't show up on list of Wikipedians by number of edits, I'm afraid, and I see no other reason for this excessive number of edits to a page. Ss112 23:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:DATERANGE

Please read MOS:DATERANGE. We type out year ranges (2016–2017) in full now, unless space is very limited. In the infobox "Recorded" parameter, space is not extremely limited, as the date range should be the only thing on the lines, so stop changing it to "2016–17". Ss112 19:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop disregarding what you have already been told, as you did at Dreamland (Robert Miles album). Stop changing year spans to "1994–96". It is "1994–1996". Ss112 22:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genre changes

When you change genres back to what they previously were on a page, please leave an edit summary stating such. Others can mistake your edits for WP:OR, as the genres are unsourced anyway. Ss112 01:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BRD

I think you need to review the process of WP:BRD. When you change content on a page and are reverted, you don't keep changing it back. You either open a discussion on the talk page, or you leave it, otherwise you are edit warring. That's not a good place for any user, especially IP addresses, to be in. Ss112 18:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at George Michael, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 04:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.