Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estelle Lazer

Estelle Lazer

Estelle Lazer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to indicate that the subject passes WP:PROF. There has been some press coverage of her work on Pompeii, but not enough to meet the WP:GNG. – Joe (talk) 11:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 12:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 12:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

• Delete does not pass the notability requirements for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
• Delete. Early career academics are not usually notable, as here. TV presence not yet enough for WP:GNG WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC).
• Keep I turned up numerous mentions in decent sources. here are a couple of pages in a book. Another book mention. Another book mention here. Mention in New Scientist. A book mention on her Antarctic work. She is quoted at length in the New York Times here. The evening Standard mentions her here. Republicca.it (Italian) mentions her Pompei work here. El Pais has something substantial here. Here is a Cambridge University-published book that devotes a few pages to her Pompei scanner work. She may not meet the pure research standard for notability, but with refs like these I believe she has met the GNG.104.163.152.194 (talk) 06:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)