Jump to content

Talk:American Community Survey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shel5136 (talk | contribs) at 15:28, 19 May 2017 (Incorrect Logo in infobox, and incorrect info). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Incorrect Logo in infobox, and incorrect info

This logo is not in use and should be removed. Likewise, the "inauguration" date is wrong; the ACS went full sample size in 2005. True, it is an extension of the old census long form (1940), but as written this is misleading. There are a number of other factual errors in the article I'm intending to clean up; please see my user info. --Shel5136 (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Shel5136 (talk) 15:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Implementation section: updated 2012 response rate reference to current approximate rate, updated cite.Shel5136 (talk) 15:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Costs of Survey

Does anyone know the annual cost of ACS (or other surveys)?

((Survey costs seem to be a much under-reported subject.))

Johnbibby (talk) 10:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In 2005-6, evidently $146-170 million for one year.[1]

Vandalism

Was this page vandalised? The introduction seems to have been written by somebody incredibly biased on the subject


McMouse —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.239.217.81 (talk) 16:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? Which way do you believe the introduction to be biased, pro or con? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.30.235 (talk) 22:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the date of his comment and the date of yours. Here is the revision he was referring to: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=American_Community_Survey&oldid=255861370 216.183.249.194 (talk) 14:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

Perhaps there should be a section about the issues with ACS data, more links to comparability between the Decennial Census and ACS. I will throw out there issues of Population count in College communities. The Census conducts a Population count on one specific date, as the ACS takes a population count over the whole year. When college students go home, the College population can be under-represented by the ACS.

This would be good, especially for issues such as "inability to opt out" and "is not anonymous" - unlike the normal census. -98.154.249.46 (talk) 10:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

It's there, but it's subtle. For instance, the second paragraph under "Implementation" folds criticism into the section, breaking the encyclopedic format in the process: "...if you don't respond we follow-up with phone calls and/or visits. However, Section 221 of Title 13 U.S.C., makes it a misdemeanor to refuse or willfully neglect to complete the questionnaire or answer questions posed by census takers and imposes a fine of not more than $100. This fine is changed by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 from $100 to not more than $5,000. To date, no person has ever been charged with a crime for refusing to answer the ACS survey, which several U.S. Representatives have challenged..." Would an NPOV tablet be appropriate? I lean no, but I encourage the authors of those views to at least transplant that sort of critical review, as factual as it may be, into the "Opposition" section. Thanks! J1.grammar natz (talk) 14:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New section and citations

I'm a GIS analyst and frequent user of ACS data who just discovered how incomplete this page is. I added a new section on the unusual (compared to the decennial census) data release schedule. RIP 3-year estimates. I also added a number of citations and consolidated the legal info into the opposition section. I'd be happy to add more technical information but I doubt that would meet notability standards. Dmahr (talk) 19:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Community Survey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]