User:Mlh3/sandbox

Peer Review (by Mgottlieb):

-All information here is relevant to the article, though (as you note) the information is underdeveloped in several places.

-For the most part, the article is neutral, but I wonder if you could provide reviews that were not positive, as well, to keep it even more balanced in the reception of this article

-The plot of the text is overrepresented in this article, which may be a challenge for you to add enough information that the summary is not the most signifiant part of this article

-The links work and support the facts provided here

-While facts are backed by sources, some sources seem unreliable. For example, Christian Science Monitor's Top 10 book list does not necessarily serve as a credible source. There is no direct bias, but unreliable sources distract from the points of this article.

-The reviews provided are not dated, but I think it would be great to provide more recent reviews, as well, especially reviews perhaps comping Longbourn to the many other Jane Austen fan fiction pieces

Possible Sources:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/24/book-review-longbourn/

Birk, Hanne, and Marion Gymnich, editors. Pride and Prejudice 2.0: Interpretations, Adaptations, and Transformations of Jane Austen's Classic. V&R Unipress, 2015.

Longbourn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Longbourn is a 2013 novel by British novelist Jo Baker, author of six novels. The novel is based on Jane Austen's Pride & Prejudice and takes place at the same time as that novel, telling the story from the perspective of the servants at Longbourn, the Bennet family home. The novel was inspired by the fact that Baker's ancestors had been in service.

The novel has been praised by various establishments such as USA Today, New York Times, Washington Post, and GoodReads. It has also earned the Seattle Times Best Title Award for 2013 and the Christian Science Monitor Top 10 Books in 2013.

The novel is a regency, romance fan fiction novel that grapples with the themes of classism, money, education, status, and propriety through the character of Sarah, an orphan girl.

Plot[edit]

Sarah is a young woman of marrying age. Orphaned, she came to work for the Bennet family with whom she still resides along with the other servants including the married Mr and Mrs Hill and the much younger Polly. Because of the prospect of war, manservants are scarce. However, Mrs Hill is able to employ James Smith, a handsome but mysterious man whom Sarah is initially intrigued by. However, Sarah's attentions are quickly caught by a manservant at Netherfield Hall, a handsome black man who later reveals he is a former slave named Ptolemy Bingley.

Because of the relationship between the Bingleys and the Bennets, Ptolemy often comes to Netherfield and has the opportunity to talk to Sarah who is intrigued by him. On the night of the Netherfield ball Sarah is tasked with staying up all night to receive the family when they come home. She gets drunk and makes her way to Netherfield where she runs into Ptolemy and the two share a drunken kiss. Shortly after he reveals that the entire Bingley family is returning to London. Sarah decides to join him, running away in the night, but James follows her and begs her to at least write a letter in advance so that she will not be socially ruined. Sarah kisses James in order to have a point of comparison with Ptolemy. She feels a closer connection with James and returns home with him and the two begin a secret sexual relationship.

Elizabeth goes to visit the newly married Charlotte Collins and takes Sarah with her to London and Hunsford. Sarah does not meet Ptolemy on her travels and is more than happy to return to the Bennet household. However James has grown suspicious of Wickham, who frequently tries to befriend the staff, especially Polly. After catching a drunk Wickham trying to kiss Polly he hits him. Wickham reveals that he suspects that James has deserted the army and threatens to tell Mr. Bennet unless James leaves on his own. In the middle of the night James abandons the Bennet home which is only discovered by Polly and Mrs Hill in the morning.

A flashback reveals that James is the illegitimate son of Mrs Hill and Mr Bennett and that Mr Hill is gay and Mrs Hill married him to fend off rumours and to protect her own name. James is raised by the Smiths, neighbouring farmers, but as soon as he is able to he runs away and joins the army. In Spain he is tried as a deserter and whipped severely though he never intended to desert the army. Shocked by this betrayal he kills the man who tried him as a deserter and eventually does run away, only to return to work for Mr Bennet as he remembers him visiting him during his childhood and being kind to him.

Sarah and Mrs Hill are distressed by James's sudden disappearance though they are unable to do much to learn of where he went. When Lydia elopes with Wickham the house is turned over in turmoil and Mrs Hill reminds Mr Bennet of all he did for Lydia while not lifting a finger for his son.

Elizabeth eventually becomes engaged to Mr Darcy and asks Sarah to work for her as her lady's maid. Ptolemy Bingley, still working for Mr Bingley returns and proposes to Sarah. Though Mrs Hill is in favour of the match Sarah decides to leave with Elizabeth.

Though the work is much easier for Sarah, she despises life at Pemberly. The day before Lady Day, Mr Bingley and Jane visit the Darcys. Ptolemy Bingley is with them and tells Sarah that he has seen James. On Lady Day Sarah abruptly quits Mrs Darcy's service and goes looking for James.

Polly eventually becomes a teacher, Mr Hill dies, and Mrs Hill spends most of the rest of her days with an increasingly mournful Mr Bennet. Sarah does catch up to James and they eventually have a child together, eventually returning to Longbourn.

Reception[edit]

The novel received positive reviews upon publication. Diane Johnson writing for The New York Times called the novel "an affecting look at the world of “Pride and Prejudice,” but from another point of view — the servants’ hall.". She referred to the book as unsubtle though praised the book for the "lovely moments" brought about by Sarah's point of view.

In another review in The Washington Times, Claire Hopley praises the novel, stating that though it is not in the same style of Jane Austen, it still a "thoroughly researched description of the servants’ toil." Hopley also notes that Baker's choice to include James' life in the Penninsula War is in response to Austen's critics who complain about the absence of the Napoleonic War in her novels.

Carmela Ciuraru in USA Today discusses how readers of Longbourn who are looking for a different perspective on Elizabeth Bennett and Darcy will be sorely disappointed because the book mainly focuses on the hard lives of regency era servants. She ends her review by calling the work a "bold novel, subversive in ways that prove surprising, and brilliant on every level" that stays true to wit of Jane Austen as well as add new perspectives and sympathies to the lives of servants.

On GoodReads, Longbourn has received over 38,000 ratings with over 6,000 reviews, earning an overall score of 3.62.

In an interview with Jo Baker, Petra Mayer asks the author about her inspiration for Longbourn. She says, "I found something in the existing text that niggled me, that felt unresolved, and wanted to explore it further." Baker said that she has always loved a Jane Austen novels but had always felt like she belonged in it because Baker has ancestors in service. and wanted to explore that perspective of the novel. Baker also discusses how she views her fan fiction in the same category as Jean Rhys's response to Jane Eyre and Tom Stoppard's response to Hamlet. In addition to her inspiration, Baker spends time in the interview conversing about the character of Mr. Bennett. Baker believes that film adaptations make him a "cozier" character then in Austen's novel. so Baker feels that she has upheld Austen's Mr. Bennett by making him jaded and partial in Longbourn.

Article Evaluation: Jane Austen Fan Fiction

• My first reaction to the list of fan fiction is that it is too short. A quick google search reveals the top ten best sellers of Jane Austen fan fiction and not even half of them are on the list (e.g. Longbourn, Austenland, Mr. Darcy's Diary, An Assembly Such as This)
• A controversy section could be added about critics who disagree with Austen Fan Fiction.
• There is a broken link that needs to be fixed:  http://www.austen.com/
• There does not seem to be much scholarly activity since most of the links come from newspaper reviews of the books
• The site fails to mention the Republic of Pemberly ("In 2000, there were one million page views of its fan-fiction area each year, and most of their fanfic authors are female. Stories based on Pride and Prejudice dominate the site as it is the most popular Austen work."). Wikipedia has a link to it, but I think the Republic should be mentioned in the article about fan fiction.
• There is no discussion of the word "fannon"
• I think the summaries of the books could be rewritten and expanded
• Maybe a tab about fan fiction reception might be interesting.
• Overall I think that this site was created by a Jane Austen fan and could benefit from a Jane Austen scholar.
• There are no conversations on the talk page.