Talk:Monica Crowley

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2015; 2017; 2018; 2019;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WikiProject Donald Trump

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

It is requested that an image or photograph of Monica Crowley be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Error in template User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis: parameter archiveprefix is required and cannot be the result of an un-subst'd template or expression

More on Accusations of Plagiarism

Wikipedia contributers keep changing the "Accusation of Plagiarism" subsection to give the reader the impression that the allegations are disputed when in fact there really isn't any debate about whether Monica Crowley plagiarized. The Wall Street Journal printed an apology. That should be sufficient evidence. In addition, the people editing this section keep inserting text defending Crowley's use of the phrase "with credit", which suggests that this is the only example of plagiarism in her article. It's not. There are numerous examples, many of which are shown on this very discussion page. Finally, whoever is making the changes has a chatty and sometimes incoherent writing style that does not adhere to the stylistic guidelines of Wikipedia.

I think it would be worthwhile to block these people from editing the page or to prohibit further edits to the page for a few weeks. 71.237.179.8 (talk) 20:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the plagiarism section (someone vandalized it again), and put in a request for temporary protection. Mkblackstone (talk) 03:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chatty and incoherent writing style? It's probably Monica herself! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.255.83 (talk) 20:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The impression given is that Ms Crawley was charged, sued and convicted in court. She was not. Plus the Article was not an exact copy and it was so short I challenge anybody to write one that addresses the same issues that were addressed in the article. The Daily Kos a hateful blog that targets GOP writers and often posts half truths. They do not have balance there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.152.200.80 (talk) 00:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Every word of that is false. -- Jibal (talk) 04:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have been reading college students papers for 30 years. The plagiarism from her book is the worst i have ever seen. if you want to see a summary take a look here:

http://money.cnn.com/interactive/news/kfile-trump-monica-crowley-plagiarized-multiple-sources-2012-book/Pmchaffie (talk) 04:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Running for Senate?

On The Mclaughlin Group (1/2/09) the panelists were asked as their last question what was their New Year's resolution. Crowley stated that she wanted to "throw [her] hat into the New York Senate race". I am going to include this in the article if there are no objections. If there is you all can edit or do what you want with it. Here's the link Im going to use to reference it http://www.mclaughlin.com/library/transcript.htm?id=699.

Her statement is way towards the bottom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.242.174 (talk) 20:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I watched that particular show and she was being facetious, kind of a backhand dig at Obama's lack of experience (and Hillary's, too). I'll 86 that entire section if no one minds. Kidshare (talk) 19:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So you think she was just foolin. Thats sounds about right since I haven't heard anything else about it. What section are you refering to when you say you want to 86 it? There are no sections in the main article talking about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.242.174 (talk) 21:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted "Obama" section in Controversies

I deleted the entire run-on sentence, mainly because I listen to Limbaugh and Hannity every day and they criticize Obama every day, so what if Monica Crowley does so. Not to mention the fact that Keith Olbermann has been unquotable since he left sports. Wow, this article is getting short and sweet, isn't it? Kidshare (talk) 18:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You wear your political agenda on your sleeve. Please leave the editing to those capable of neutrality. -- Jibal (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--

I copied most of what you removed and added it back. The reference material has more citations than a doctoral paper. If you have a problem with the wording, bias, or factual nature of the content, have at it. Otherwise, go enjoy your television shows and leave your partisan edits out of the wiki. 24.57.54.1 (talk) 03:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2017 plagiarism allegation

CNN have just emailed 'breaking news' that Crowley's 2012 book plagiarised 50 sources, including Wikipedia. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This allegation of plagiarism is just that, an allegation, and s/n be represented as true fact in WP's voice, especially this is a BLP. IHTS (talk) 05:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's more than "just" an allegation. It's an allegation supported by facts, in this case a comparison between the text of the unattributed sources and the text of the Crowley's book. It's also an allegation that has been reported by multiple WP:RS, such as Politico. It should be included in the entry according to WP:WEIGHT "in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources." --Nbauman (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This allegation of plagiarism is just that, an allegation -- Blatantly false. The allegation is based on evidence.

and s/n be represented as true fact in WP's voice -- that's not how WP works. It doesn't offer "true facts", nor does it have a "voice". Statements appearing in WP articles are sourced. It is not the job of editors to make an independent assessment of whether the claims in reliable sources are true. -- Jibal (talk) 04:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And now we have very strong evidence she plagiarized frequently in her PhD dissertation. Will probably have to change the education section to reflect that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.220.41.77 (talk) 06:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More new evidence: Her publisher has yanked her book. A Trump transition spokesperson had previously cited the publication of the book by HarperCollins as evidence in Crowley's favor, so this is significant. It's now noted in the body of the article but should be in the introductory section where the allegations are noted. JamesMLane t c 17:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BLF Deletion of possibly defamatory content

I deleted the allegations of plagiarism as controversial and possibly defamatory about a living person. (PeacePeace (talk) 04:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC))[reply]

The content is reliably sourced. There's no RS reporting that conflicts with the RS used in this article as far as I'm aware. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monica Crowley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120102081049/http://www.wabcradio.com/showdj.asp?DJID=15060 to http://wabcradio.com/showdj.asp?DJID=15060

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]