Jump to content

User talk:Heliosxeros

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vermont (talk | contribs) at 11:08, 8 April 2018 (→AfC Reviewing: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

13:37:50, 28 March 2018 review of submission by Carlosmoreira69


Carlos Moreira 13:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

INQUIRY ON PEARL OF AFRICA (PAE) SUBMISSION.

Hello, I hope you are well. I would like to kindly request you to tell me into depth the reason for your decline on the article I wrote about the NGO in Uganda, Africa, pearlofafricaenvironment.org I would humbly like to know so in order to sufficiently improve my article. I have recently improved it after your feedback so I hereby request you to look at it and inform me of any changes that you believe ought to be made.

Thank you and any help rendered to me will highly be appreciated. I will be awaiting your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linah Nanziri (talk • contribs) 14:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lethal White (novel) Submission Inquiry

I have replied to your notification on my Talk page. Can you read it and respond? -- IbexNu (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:52:24, 29 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Linah Nanziri


Greetings and thank you for the prompt and helpful response. I have read those recommended pages before but I nevertheless highly appreciate your effort in sharing them with me so as to remind me of some aspects that I had not paid close attention to. I have completely adjusted the puffery language and neutralized all statements made in the article, as you said. I also altered the language used in the Summary of Campaigns section in order to neutralise it. You recommended that it ought to be deleted, however, it is the core basis of the NGOs activities, which are also evinced in the reference list, hence its relevance to the article.

I hereby request you to read the adjustments and feasibly publish my article, thank you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Linah_Nanziri

Linah Nanziri (talk) 13:52, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thanks for reading my draft! TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 03:23, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:34:59, 30 March 2018 review of submission by W.J. Gies


Hello, and thank you for your review. We understand the need for outside articles and will address that immediately. May I ask how our submission is more like an advertisement than the International College of Dentists? Their first sentence is factually inaccurate (they have had to change their website to remove the claim that they are the oldest honorary dental society), and they also only speak of the positive things the organization has done, as have we. Could you please provide a specific example of what makes ours an advertisement, or is it more that we need other sources?

We are new to this and we appreciate your help.

W.J. Gies (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

01:46:21, 31 March 2018 review of submission by Ddennis.cpa


I am new at this and am trying to understand why this reads as an advertisement. This is a regulatory body. Can you please advise how I should change this. Thank you.

Ddennis.cpa (talk) 01:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10:05:17, 1 April 2018 review of submission by Carlosmoreira69


Carlos Moreira 10:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

21:15:54, 1 April 2018 review of submission by Kokeyama


I’m confused, IMDB, the industry database for films, is not a reliable source? The majority of films listed on Wikipedia have IMDB links. If IMDb is not suitable, what movie databases are? Kokeyama (talk) 21:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Garden revision.

Hello Heliosxeros,

I recently saw a message you put up on the article that I was creating called The Garden. You mentioned that IMDB was not a credible source so I removed all sources for IMDB from the page. I also cut down the plot line as you said it was too long.

Have a nice day, Oxxymoron — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oxxymoron (talk • contribs) 20:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jack Muller / Danie Uys Park

Good day Heliosxeros

I have re-written certain aspects to be more formal, and any possible peacock terms have been removed

Thank you

User:Barry Ne —Preceding undated comment added 04:47, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

05:40:36, 5 April 2018 review of submission by Shanda911


Please check, I had completed the article sentences. and I'm waiting from last 28 days for re-review. Please have a look on a Draft "Mahakaal Mahakaali Temple". Shanda911 (talk) 05:40, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

07:26:16, 5 April 2018 review of submission by 2.110.71.97


Dear Heliosxeros. I am wondering why my wikipedia page got declined. Since the first draft I have added every reliable source I could find, that describes the company House of Real and not only the work they do. Nonetheless, productions companies are often defined by exactly the work they do. I have looked up other production companies to compare the number and type of sources, and it doesn't seem to me, that this page has less than average.

Would you consider reviewing it again?

All the best, Anna 2.110.71.97 (talk) 07:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@2.110.71.97: I saw that your talkpage isn't created yet so I'll reply you here. At the time I reviewed your article, the sources were not enough. PS, the sources back then were poor. Hence, I declined your article. EROS message 11:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

de.NBI page was completly reworked!

Dear Helioxeros,

thank you for help. I completely reworked the page. Can you please again review the article?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:De.NBI_-_German_Network_for_Bioinformatics_Infrastructure

Thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomAtdeNBIoffice (talk • contribs) 08:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

11:34:02, 6 April 2018 review of submission by InforgMM


Dear Reviewer, we have changed the references section, and rewritten it! Please check it again. Thank you and all the best.


InforgMM (talk) 11:34, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

14:28:50, 6 April 2018 review of submission by Uhuruguru


I am not too sure what exactly needs to be added. What additional documentation as verification can be submitted.

Uhuruguru (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

15:57:46, 6 April 2018 review of submission by Jericho55


Hello, I have added several more reputable sources such as NPR, The New York Times, and a journalistic tour of the Ponyride facility by MythBusters' Adam Savage. Please let me know if this helps get the article closer to being accepted.

Jericho55 (talk) 15:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Lutheran Church Building in Strand Street,Cape Town

Hi Heliosxeros

Thanks for the advice

I have added news paper and magazine references


Regards

User:Barry Ne —Preceding undated comment added 16:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:59:54, 6 April 2018 review of submission by Vertalis


Vertalis (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I have added 4 more sources. Was there anything wrong with the existing ones?

Request on 02:16:20, 7 April 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Linah Nanziri


Greetings! It is completely understandable that you were unable to reply, supposedly because you were enjoying your Easter holidays (hopefully). I would also like to deeply appreciate your prompt response, nonetheless. I do understand your plausible concern in regards to including information of the charity's recent activities, however, this is likely to contrast the Wikipedia guidelines, as you stated earlier, which involves the inclusion of promotional information. This is quintessentially due to the fact that all the information stated in the article is staunchly evidenced by articles from notable and reliable media companies such as BBC, The Telegraph, Daily Monitor, among others. Additional information on the charity's recent activities can be found online, however, they are blogs, which are considered unreliable as per Wikipedia guidelines. I henceforth presume that adding any information which is not backed by reliable sources would appear quite promotional. However, more articles from notable sources are yet to be included online since the charity has had recent coverage. Once the additional information is published, the editing process on this article will commence and undergo review as well. I, hereby, proffer my request to you to publish the article since I am certain that I have met all Wikipedia requirements and standards.

Thank you.

Linah Nanziri (talk) 02:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Source you put in are better now. I see your dilemma with the blogs. In time, I am sure that media coverage will be given on the organisation and it is then that you can expand it further. Your draft will be reviewed by other reviewers soon. In the mean time, you are welcomed to contribute to Wikipedia on topics of your interest. Cheers and happy editing. EROS message 02:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

09:37:32, 7 April 2018 review of submission by Emonkhan


Hello there, I would like to ask few questions regarding your rejection of the article Nazmee Jannat. You pointed out that the mere mention will not be accepted as noteworthy for a figure, however, I provided news link of 9 prominent online newsportal of Bangladesh. In every of the news, the subject got proper highlight and the main topic of discussion. Unfortunately all the news are in Bengali, is it like this that you could not read it out properly as it is in foreign language and I should leave reference those are written in English? Thank you! Emonkhan (talk) 09:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC) Emonkhan (talk) 09:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the rejection of article Nazmee Jannat

Hello there,

Recently you have rejected the page Nazmee Jannat and mentioned the reason which is interesting. You said all the mentions in those references are not important, or mere mention. However all the references provided there are links from Bangladesh's prominent newsportal and the subject is the main point of discussion. I wonder, is it that you could not read an article written on foreign language properly? Should I add references those are written in English? Like link of English dailies? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emonkhan (talk • contribs) 09:41, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Carson Booth

Steven Carson Booth Hi! I am the author of this page and am himself. You rejected the submission due to not enough reliable sources. I deleted the LinkedIn reference but have several other verifiable references including IMDB and other sources from the web. Can you remove your rejection or tell me how many additional sources are required if LinkedIn is insufficient? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hospibio (talk • contribs) 11:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hospibio: It is not encouraged to write your own autobiography as there maybe conflict of interest. Read: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Basically, cite third party sources: mainstream publication, magazines, newspapers and books. Your sources must be independent from the subject and topic. Eg. homepages or official pages. Avoid user-generated content like twitter, fb or youtube. Moreover, IMDB is not considered a reliable source on Wiki as the former only provides listing. EROS message 13:34, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Scott article

Hi there, Thanks so much for reviewing my article - I have added further citations to Neil's work on TV, his drama production details and rugby interview with the independent.

I am up to 6 separate citations - is there aomething else I am missing? Many thanks in advance - i hugely appreciate your support with this.

Kerry Wise. 7/4/18 KWise007 (talk) 14:32, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC Reviewing

I felt it necessary to inform you that you apparently forgot to check User:Darkwolfz/sandbox for copyright violations. The entire article, save for the infobox and external link section, was copied from the about page of the subject's website. Happy editing! Vermont | reply here 11:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Heliosxeros&oldid=835384258"