User talk:Dahmer's Refrigerator
Ahem...
Hope this isn't a (poor) joke. Think you'll have to prove your worthiness here. Expect scrutiny, mate.--Kieronoldham (talk) 02:22, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- I think that I can also say, that I welcome this kind of examination, because people need to know whether your president is a crook. Well, I'm not a crook. I earned everything I got." - Richard Nixon Dahmer's Refrigerator (talk) 04
- 16, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 20:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Fake news and CNN
Your posts to Talk:Fake news aren't acceptable and appear to be trolling. Do it again and you'll be blocked. Doug Weller talk 20:38, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 20:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Dahmer's Refrigerator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Wow! Wikipedia is a censored site. I didn't even get a warning. Would it be fair if I agree to only edit pages as a member of the Serial Killer Task Force, which is why I joined in the first place? I have other interests as you can see, like flight simulation, law enforcement agencies, and South King County, WA. It is not fair to conclude that I am "not here to build an encyclopedia". I have a lot to contribute. I was drunk the other night. If I am limited to editing serial killer pages, do I have to avoid Jewish serial killers? Dahmer's Refrigerator (talk) 03:59, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were warned several times above. Having reviewed your talkpage posts, it looks as though you're clear here for the lulz; we don't tolerate that. Yunshui 雲水 07:56, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
To make it clear
Editors who uses talk pages to say "Protocols of Zion are real. It is the Jewish fake news media that pretends it is fake." clearly aren't here to improve Wikipedia. So far as I'm concerned, you should only be unblocked if you accept a topic ban from all articles, talk pages, etc dealing with American politics or religion. Doug Weller talk 20:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Antisemitism has no place here
Wikipedia is valuable precisely because it manages to combine so many different people. Antisemitism is hurtful and inconducive to that and has no place here Shushugah (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC) Shushugah (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- What exactly is "anti-Semitism"? Dahmer's Refrigerator (talk) 04:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Is asking "what exactly is anti-Semitism" anti-Semetic? Dahmer's Refrigerator (talk) 04:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)