Jump to content

Talk:Jeremy Clarkson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 01:26, 28 February 2019 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Jeremy Clarkson/Archive 3) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good articleJeremy Clarkson was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 7, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 19, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:Vital article

Survey about top image

A
B
These are two candidates for the top image.

Semi-protected edit request on 21 January 2018

I think the Superinjunction that was lifted by Clarkson should be mentioned - information surplus to this can be gained from this short video: https://youtube.com/8mxylHly7hQ of it being mentioned on the BBC Programme Have I Got News For You. Euanjamie (talk) 15:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We don't generally use YouTube as a source for this kind of thing. And the link you have provided doesn't work. If you can find one or more reliable sources, then it could be added. You'll need to suggest the wording you want to be added. But the article already says this (fully sourced):
"In September 2010 Clarkson was granted a privacy injunction against his first wife to prevent her from publishing claims that their sexual relationship continued after his second marriage (see AMM v HXW). He voluntarily lifted the injunction in October 2011, commenting that: "Injunctions don’t work. You take out an injunction against somebody or some organisation and immediately news of that injunction and the people involved and the story behind the injunction is in a legal-free world on Twitter and the Internet. It’s pointless."
if this is what you are referring to. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Already done As per above, request is already in the article. requester hasn't returned to respond with clarification. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Playing cards

The Times: Jeremy Clarkson "Ties? Rubbers? Five equals 11? Learning to play bridge left me vulnerable to a large glass of red". I would like to put it in - ok? --SkatPi (talk) 16:43, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit WP:NOTNEWS because it doesn't seem to add very much to a reader's knowledge of Clarkson.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2019

Change the link attached to the word 'original' seen here; " "Help for Heroes official site". Helpforheroes.org.uk. Archived from the original on 31 December 2010. Retrieved 25 August 2010.", from https://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/patrons.html to https://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/about/working-at-help-for-heroes/team-help-for-heroes/ 86.188.164.42 (talk) 11:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where does Clarkson appear at the Help for Heroes website page? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: It's not clear why this needs to be changed. I would be willing to change the source for this statement to an independent source, however. Bradv🍁 05:56, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TFI Friday

In the presenter section, it says that he has hosted TFI Friday. But he has not hosted it ever. So, I think that should be removed based on that fact. 78.148.236.61 (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]