Jump to content

Rust V. Sullivan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kjmms1 (talk | contribs) at 17:42, 29 March 2019 (Added information about Title X). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rust v. Sullivan, 111 U.S 1759 (1991),[1] is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court where petitioner Erving Rust et al. claimed that federal regulations created under Title X were in violation of the first and fifth amendments. Title X is a federal grant program passed in 1970 designed to offer prenatal and sexual healthcare to impoverished families and women.[2] The federal regulations stated that Family Planning Clinics could not provide counseling or education on abortions.[3] According to the plaintiffs this was a clear violation of the constitution and of a women's right to abortion. The court ruled 5-4 that the federal regulations were not in violation of either amendment because the language used in Title X is generic and allows such constructions to be put in place.[4]

This template should only be used in the user namespace.This template should only be used in the user namespace.

  1. ^ Freyer, Tony. "Rust v. Sullivan." Dictionary of American History, edited by Stanley I. Kutler, 3rd ed., vol. 7, Charles Scribner's Sons, 2003, p. 216. U.S. History in Context, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX3401803671/UHIC?u=mcc_pv&sid=UHIC&xid=0bde1c67. Accessed 23 Mar. 2019.
  2. ^ |last1= Coleman |last2= Jones, |first1= Clare |first2= Kirtly Parker (September 2011). "Title X: a proud past, an uncertain future". Contraception. 84: 209–211 – via Elsevier.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ "Rust v. Sullivan." Great American Court Cases, edited by Mark Mikula and L. Mpho Mabunda, vol. 3: Equal Protection and Family Law, Gale, 1999. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ2303200568/OVIC?u=mcc_pv&sid=OVIC&xid=8a71deef. Accessed 23 Mar. 2019.
  4. ^ "Rust v. Sullivan". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2019-03-24.