User talk:NotTfue123

NotTfue123 (Talk)

Hi NotTfue123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 07:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: GoldStar (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GoldStar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:GoldStar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Socks

Why are you tagging sock accounts? Praxidicae (talk) 11:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of ProLink for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ProLink is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProLink until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ——SerialNumber54129 12:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Unblock

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

NotTfue123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't make any mistake, rather Praxidicae asked about my account which I had abandoned 10 years before.I am banned still, I want to do necessary edits to ProLink so please help. I am here to built wikipedia. NotTfue123 (Talk) 12:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I didn't make any mistake, rather [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] asked about my account which I had abandoned 10 years before.I am banned still, I want to do necessary edits to [[ProLink]] so please help. I am here to built wikipedia. [[User:NotTfue123|<font color="Red" face="Jokerman"><i><b>Not</b></i></font><font face="Arial Rounded MT Bold" style="color:blue"><b>Tfue</b></font><font style="color:orange"><b>123</b></font>]] [[User_Talk:NotTfue123|<font color="violet">(Talk)</font>]] 12:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I didn't make any mistake, rather [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] asked about my account which I had abandoned 10 years before.I am banned still, I want to do necessary edits to [[ProLink]] so please help. I am here to built wikipedia. [[User:NotTfue123|<font color="Red" face="Jokerman"><i><b>Not</b></i></font><font face="Arial Rounded MT Bold" style="color:blue"><b>Tfue</b></font><font style="color:orange"><b>123</b></font>]] [[User_Talk:NotTfue123|<font color="violet">(Talk)</font>]] 12:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I didn't make any mistake, rather [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] asked about my account which I had abandoned 10 years before.I am banned still, I want to do necessary edits to [[ProLink]] so please help. I am here to built wikipedia. [[User:NotTfue123|<font color="Red" face="Jokerman"><i><b>Not</b></i></font><font face="Arial Rounded MT Bold" style="color:blue"><b>Tfue</b></font><font style="color:orange"><b>123</b></font>]] [[User_Talk:NotTfue123|<font color="violet">(Talk)</font>]] 12:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Help

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied, we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details, there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.

   Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.

   If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.

2. Try to edit the Sandbox.

   If you are able to edit the sandbox, you are not blocked from editing. Either the autoblock on your IP address has already expired, or you weren't blocked in the first place. Either way, you can resume editing.

3. If you are still blocked, follow the directions below:
   1. Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Unblock request" section.
   2. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page, and click save.

      If you cannot edit your own talk page, use the Unblock Ticket Request System to make your request.

NotTfue123 (Talk) 12:47, 9 April 2019 (UTC)