Talk:Peggy Stewart (actress)

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Death

The only source of death is from the Brazilian blog Memórias Cinematográficas. Is this a reliable source or did they just copy Wikipedia like many others (the only addition is that she died at her home)? This sounds strange for a death that occurred in the USA. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent Lefèvre, Blogs are generally not considered to be reliable sources for Wikipedia. A reliable source should be provided to support the information in question. Eddie Blick (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So I assume that the edits by Gianluigi02 and ThatBaileyLad about her supposed death should be reverted. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure go ahead but there was no need to tag me --ThatBaileyLad (talk) 22:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 23:01, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We used Aveleyman.com to update Meg Randall's page. The site has always been reliable and is not blacklisted (SAG-AFTRA or something similar later confirmed Randall's death), so don't revert edits pretending they are unsourced.--Folengo (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Folengo Sorry, my mistake. I initially saw the latest anonymous edit Special:Diff/899921916, which added the death in the infobox, and did not see immediately that a source was added in a previous edit, then I reverted the other ones without checking carefully. But please, when doing a change in an article, add something useful in the summary (the log), which is what is visible in the history; yours was empty and this was not helpful. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]