Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Record Charts
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Record Charts and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Record Charts NA‑class | |||||||
|
This page was nominated for deletion on 29 August 2010. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none
parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:36, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
Billboard Year-End Top Singles 1946-1949
Is there a reason these pages don't exist? There are pages for 1950 on, but these four years are unaccounted for. Jtbrubak (talk) 18:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Probably because either nobody has ever bothered to create the pages, or they don't have access to the sources to add as references, or both. Richard3120 (talk) 18:47, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Jtbrubak, a pretty complete archive of Billboard can be found at AmericanRadioHistory.com if you want to see if the year-end charts are there. You could definitely make them yourself if you wanted to. Toa Nidhiki05 14:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Canadian RPM charts
Does anyone have access to a book or database archive of the Canadian RPM charts? I’ve been working on some discographies recently and some of the artists have extensive numbers of entries, making it hard to find the peak dates and all charting songs using the manual archive search. Specifically I am looking for the Top Singles and Adult Contemporary charts. Toa Nidhiki05 13:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Scans of almost all the charts are available at the Canadian Archives at http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/films-videos-sound-recordings/rpm/Pages/search.aspx, but you will have to have some idea of the year and the month that the record charted, because they are scans and you can't search by artist or title, only by issue date. Richard3120 (talk) 14:05, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- That’s what I’ve been using, I’m more specifically asking if anyone knows of or has access to a book with these results. It’s certainly fine to use that method (it just takes a bit of work), but if it were in a book everything could be cited to one source as opposed to many individual sources. Toa Nidhiki05 14:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, I see, my apologies. No, as far as I know, no book has ever been produced of the RPM charts, and that database is the only one in existence. Of course, not being from either Canada or the US means I'm no authority on the matter, and I could be wrong. Richard3120 (talk) 14:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- That’s what I’ve been using, I’m more specifically asking if anyone knows of or has access to a book with these results. It’s certainly fine to use that method (it just takes a bit of work), but if it were in a book everything could be cited to one source as opposed to many individual sources. Toa Nidhiki05 14:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)