User talk:Hachengsa

Welcome!

Hi Hachengsa! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Java Hurricane 14:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hachengsa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't done any vandalism. I've not done any disruptive edit. My previous account was targeted by same person and his friend circle. They blocked my earlier account - Logical Man 2000. I wanted to fresh start a new account without touching any controversial thing as suggested by some article in Wikipedia. This account is also targeted by same person. Now I'm blocked. I didn't join Wikipedia to disrupt anything. No editor can show any disruptive edit by me. I'm not experienced with sock puppetry. A person revert my referenced edits and then he argue and complain and then somebody block me. It's personal attack. Hachengsa (talk) 18:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of Sairg (talk · contribs). Editors may not use a "fresh start" to evade a current block, and using multiple accounts to avoid scrutiny is also forbidden. If you wish to be unblocked please read the guide to appealing blocks and prepare an unblock request from your original account. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ivanvector: Please compare my account with Sairg. I've no connection with that account. I've connection with Logical Man 2000. Logical Man 2000 was also blocked just based on accusation of having connection with Sairg. Basis for my first block itself is wrong. I've no connection with Sairg. Please ask another checkuser to compare Sairg and This account. I had left logical man 2000 and added retired tag on that account. Hachengsa (talk) 21:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]