User talk: Diannaa

Why was the page deleted?

Why was this

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Chamkaur

deleted? Your Log indicates copyright violation of the page https://www.rarebooksocietyofindia.org/postDetail.php?id=196174216674_10154207347961675

But in actuality this page did not contain such content that someone would delete the page? Refer to the wayback: https://web.archive.org/web/20170318123353/https://www.rarebooksocietyofindia.org/postDetail.php?id=196174216674_10154207347961675

Requesting to undelete the page. bandukia (talk) 04:57, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The material you claim was copied, says that it copied its content from Wikipedia, so deletion of the Wikipedia page is almost certainly in error. I suggest that you reverse the deletion of Battle of Chamkaur. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To add more context to this, Zafarnama^[1] for which there is claim of copyright was a letter written by Guru Gobind Singh^[2] who was key participant in the Battle of Chamkaur wrote letter to Aurangzeb^[3], the letter is freely available Zafarnama-archive^[4], here as well freely available as part of Sikh Heritage^[5] and cannot have copyright claim by any one person / organisation. Please accept the undelete requests. Zereraz (talk) 12:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the page. Sorry for the mistake.— Diannaa (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thank you so much for restoring it 🙏 Zereraz (talk) 16:40, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, there were a lot of lobbyists at WP:REFUND!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was a careless mistake on my part - there were a lot of battle-of-this and battle-of-that new articles (copied from Sikh Wiki and elsewhere) that were in the copypatrol feed that day, and I just didn't look at this one carefully enough!— Diannaa (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, in addition to the page you've already restored (thank you for doing so), there were pages on wikipedia separately describing 2 battles that took place in Chamkaur 2 years apart in 1702 and 1704. These have both also been deleted, I think in error. The pages were called "First Battle of Chamkaur (1702)" and "Second Battle of Chamkaur (1704)". The links to the wiki pages are also visible on the page "List of battles involving the Sikh Empire". The separate pages for the first and second battles both say that they were deleted by yourself on 27 Dec at 1.35am. Could you please also restore both of these pages as I assume the same copyright issue does not apply here. Thanks so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:7717:8F00:9DEE:3920:1C08:8E74 (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These were both redirects, not articles per se. Regardless, I have restored them. Thanks for letting me know. — Diannaa (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI questions

Hi Diannaa, do you know of an admin or sysop who specializes in COI and company self-promotion? I'm concerned that a particular notable person and/or his companies are enhanced in self-promotion for several years but I really don't have the time or knowledge to pursue this myself. This is really something the WMF should be handling itself, and perhaps they do. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 21:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know the answer to this question. Hopefully a talk page watcher can offer suggestions— Diannaa (talk) 22:43, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MER-C might be able to help. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pancha Kashmiri Takiya Masjid

Hello, I appreciate your effort for keeping eye on copyrights.

In the page Pancha Kashmiri Takiya Masjid, you deleted two histories. But, the material used is in Public Domain [bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/5288/1/FulltextThesis.pdf] and reference has been appropriately provided in the edit. Could you explain why you deleted the edites?

Happy editing!

nirmal (talk) 01:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you believe that thesis is in the public domain?— Diannaa (talk) 01:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Convenience Store Woman

Hi Diannaa. While browsing I came across the article Convenience Store Woman with an external link to Archive.org that contains a complete copy of this book. The edit it was added is this one. In Archive.org it's tagged as OpenSource but I'm 110% certain that this has not been released open source and is very much a popular commercial publication still today. Looking further I noticed the external link was added to the article on the very same say it was added to Archive.org, by a user with multiple copyright warnings on their talk page. The user in question seems to have a history of adding things as external links the same day they're added to Archive.org and seem to be using it to bypass copyright restrictions as evidenced here as well, again uploaded the same day as the Wikipedia link is added. It is my belief that this should be A) removed as a link and B) revdelled. I did delete the link but another editor reinstated it (with a bogus summary but that's not relevant.) In your views should this be removed and revdelled? Thanks for your time and hope you're having a good holiday season. Canterbury Tail talk 14:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The external link (and others like it) should be removed, as it is contributory copyright infringement. The book enjoys copyright protection, according to the version available on Google view (Google too may be violating copyrights as well - perhaps they have permission?). Our revision deletion policy does allow such edits to be rev-deleted, but I myself have never done so.— Diannaa (talk) 14:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you for your insight, always appreciated. I'll also keep an eye on that user in future as this seems to be a pattern with their edits. Again thanks. Canterbury Tail talk 15:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio

Hi Diannaa. I hope you're having a nice holiday season. Would you mind taking a look at Rico Mascariñas#RP's Mascariñas Shine in Singapore Chess Open? I think this might just be a good-faith misunderstanding, but it's still a clear copyvio nonetheless. I wasn't able to find the original source online, but did find the article copied-and-pasted to another website PeoplePill, but that website is WP:BLACKLISTed by Wikipedia. If you search "RP's Mascariñas Shine in Singapore Chess Open" you should find it. I didn't want to create any more diffs to cleanup; so, I just tagged it as a copyvio and left it for review. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MarchJuly - all is well here! PeoplePill shows a byline of "Marlon Bernardino, National Master, Special to PhilBoxing.com, 11 October 2005" so while they are not the copyright holders of the wee article, we have to assume that it is a faithful reproduction. ~~So I will remove it.~~ Thanks for the report.— Diannaa (talk) 23:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC) Changed my mind - let's give the primary contributor their week to attempt a re-write if they so desire. Since it's going to more or less destroy the article to extract the copyvio.— Diannaa (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look. I left a note about this on the editor's user talk page at User talk:Obetpaguia#Copyright problem: Rico Mascariñas . If I got some of the basics wrong, please feel free to correct what I posted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:22, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio on Wangechi Mutu

Hello! The above page is looking particularly troublesome in terms of copyvio. Earwig here. Part of this book is a direct match, for example. Possibly (talk) 04:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We already had that content in 2016 when the book came out. It looks like it's a blurb prepared by a publicist. Both likely were supplied by same. This page was never archived by the Wayback Machine so I can't say who had it first.— Diannaa (talk) 10:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvios, certainly spamming

Hi Diannaa, Special:Contributions/Akel_iJET has added several pastes from a website that they appear to represent, particularly to Aviation fuel and Flight permit. I don't see a copyright notice on the linked site, but wanted to report it anyway just in case it needed to be deleted anyway. I've also reported the username to UAA. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 06:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 10:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you. BilCat (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios

I noticed you removed copyrighted content yesterday from spotted salamander. The same user has added content back to that page directly copied from Animal Diversity Web. This same user has added content from ADW to striped newt and CABI to Cichla ocellaris. I would appreciate your help. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 12:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup complete and user blocked. Thank you for the report.— Diannaa (talk) 15:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Diannaa!

Happy New Year!

Diannaa,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you! Same to you!— Diannaa (talk) 15:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:JustForEditingArticles

Happy 2021, Diannaa! Please take a look at the contributions of this new user, who has already spammed an apparent copyvio photo into at least four articles regarding Indian cinema and culture. Much obliged; thank you so much for all your work! - Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing further to be done at this point; the photo is slated for deletion on the Commons and the user has been warned. Thanks,— Diannaa (talk) 21:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My End of Year Wikilove

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		On this day I would like to say thank you for all that you're doing on Copyright. Happy New year! `Em-em` ^talk 20:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks— Diannaa (talk) 21:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emerald Tablet

Dear Diannaa,

First of all, I wish you a very happy new year.

I noticed that you removed a translation taken from a 1979 work I added to Emerald Tablet. I should like to think that this kind of citation would fall under fair use:

- it only cites a very small part of the translated text (the text of the tablet is always embedded in much larger works), so the use is not very substantial.

- it does not also copy the notes and comments in the original, so it does not render the original less valuable for purposes of commercial exploitation (which, because of its academic nature, is very slight in the first place).

- It also most clearly serves the advancement of general knowledge. Frankly, putting together different versions and translations of an obscure text like the Emerald Tablet has the potential of transforming its understanding even by subject specialists, who too often rely on one or two late versions, and who have no encyclopedic source (nor even secondary literature) to turn to. It is precisely this type of thing that makes digital resources like Wikipedia so wonderful. This innovative use in Wiki voice is clearly transformative.

- There is a very explicit acknowledgement of the copyrighted source: the name of the translator is cited in full in the article, and there is a full reference in the footnote.

So, based on these arguments, I would like to ask you to reconsider whether we can cite modern translations of this important historical text, for the sole purpose of improving understanding.

More specifically, I would like to add translations taken from the following sources:

Litwa, M. David 2018. Hermetica II: The Excerpts of Stobaeus, Papyrus Fragments, and Ancient Testimonies in an English Translation with Notes and Introductions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Steele, Robert and Singer, Dorothea Waley 1928. “The Emerald Table” in: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 21, pp. 41–57/485–501.

Zirnis, Peter 1979. The Kitāb Usṭuqus al-uss of Jābir ibn Ḥayyān. PhD diss., New York University.

Of those, especially David Litwa's work is very important, since it contains a translation of the oldest extant Latin translation (by Hugo of Santalla), which is especially enlightening to those accustomed only to Renaissance and modern occultist versions.

Let me know what you think,

Kind regards,

Apaugasma (talk) 22:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We have other translations; if you think it's important enough you should say why it's unique in the article rather than copy-pasting it in without context or commentary.— Diannaa (talk) 23:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I added Steele and Singer's 1928 translation of the most widely divulged Latin version to the article. I think it should be OK under fair use. Especially the contextual significance and no free equivalent in WP:NFC strongly apply: the quoted content is the very subject of the article, and there is no free translation of the Latin vulgate available. I have also updated the article to put somewhat more stress on the existence of multiple different medieval versions, which should make it clear that Newton's translation (the only free English translation of a Latin version) is really only a translation of the text as it existed in the late 17th century. If you disagree, please remove the translation I added (my last edit) from Wikipedia. Many thanks, Apaugasma (talk) 21:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Diannaa!

Happy New Year!

Diannaa,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 01:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you! Cheers!

Multiple copyright violations @ History of science and technology in Japan

Hi Diannaa. First of all, Happy New Year! When you have time, can you check out History of science and technology in Japan please? Thank you. Here's what I've found so far:

"Workable oxygen torpedo" is copied from here.
"Ijuin fuse" is copied from here.
"Forerunner of the modern flamethrower" is copied from here, here ("As early as the Russo-Japanese War..."), and here ("interest in flame weapons...").
"KS steel" is copied from here ("Honda's discovery formed an important basis...") and here.
"Hematite Reduction Process" is copied from here.
"Non-loaded Cable" is copied from here and here.
"黒田式コークス炉" is copied from here ("This furnace recovered by-products...") and here.
The new addition to "Technology in the Empire of Japan (1868-1945)" was copied from here.
The new addition to "Reactive lead oxides production method" was copied from here and here ("The company, Ost Lurgi...").

Bamnamu (talk) 02:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the copyright violations and then request revision deletion using the template {{Copyvio-revdel}}— Diannaa (talk) 04:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thank you. Bamnamu (talk) 05:54, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very helpful of you to take care of this one.— Diannaa (talk) 12:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mahar Regiment

In Overview section you reverted my work..!

Quotes given by some scholar must be copied as it is one can not change it . And most of the content I wrote by myself. I am adding the content back don't revert it .

I have also added overview discussion on talk page of Mahar Regiment share your thoughts there.

Ghoshpreet singh (talk) 03:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition was flagged by a bot as a potential copyright issue and was assessed by myself. Here is a link to the bot report. Click on the iThenticate link to view what the bot found. You will immediately see why the extent of the overlap led me to remove it all.— Diannaa (talk) 04:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay but due to quotes there will be overlap, about remaining contents I will improve it and will try to write it in my own words as much as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4042:291:C3FE:8C4B:8C3B:5F32:8704 (talk) 07:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sambavar page hidden

Sambavar is the group of people who are living in kanyakumari district majorly. they are not parayers but they have connections with them. Uthiransambavar (talk) 07:35, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

	Happy new year 2021 !
	Diannaa, Wish you and your family a very Happy and prosperous New Year! best regards RV (talk) 06:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Best wishes! — Diannaa (talk) 12:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me create a page

Can you help me create a page. I'm new to this. Avinashkiran50 (talk) 16:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Help:Your first article for how to get started.— Diannaa (talk) 19:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ship Patrick Henry

Thanks for the edits. I am the owner of the page from where I am pulling material. I have posted the wiki statement on the page. See https://michaelcharlescarolan.com/an-irish-passenger-an-american-family-and-their-time/ I hope this will suffice. I have also been vetting my own work with more references.

Also, how do i change the title of page to: Patrick Henry (packet)

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Binx1966 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in working on Wikipedia. There are a couple of problems with your submission. You cannot post copyright material on Wikipedia even if you are the copyright holder, unless special licensing permissions are in place. That is because Wikipedia aims to be freely distributable and copyable by anyone, and all content must have the appropriate documentation in place before that can happen. Please see Wikipedia:donating copyrighted materials which explains how it works.

The page can be re-named when it is moved into mainspace (i.e. accepted for publication.— Diannaa (talk) 19:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ship Patrick Henry

Ok. I put some permissions in the talk space and emailed as directed. I have added a bit more from the site, as well as more sources. I have actually resourced everything that I wrote before, and more accurately. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Binx1966 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem in the article Gupse Özay

Hello, I've noticed a copyright problem on Gupse Özay. In this series of edits 41.249.141.10 replaces the content of the article with the biography section lifted from IMDB, here. You seem to be the resident copyright problems expert so I thought you'd be the person to ask for help cleaning it up?

Thanks, 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:38, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for the report.— Diannaa (talk) 09:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Article

I had edited the content its not same i had removed and written the content completely .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitech80 (talk • contribs) 11:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition was flagged by a bot as a potential copyright issue and was assessed by myself. Here is a link to the bot report. Click on the iThenticate link to view what the bot found.— Diannaa (talk) 11:49, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

how can i fix it how much should be the match % — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitech80 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't contain anything at all copied from the the source.— Diannaa (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Diannaa,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year

Thank you for your comment on the page - Judd L. Teller. I Just removed a large section per your alert. Though I'm relatively new I just rechecked so that it meets all guidelinesHistomisus (talk) 12:43, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have done some more cleanup.— Diannaa (talk) 12:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

See this page of youtuber Maridhas, the person who created this today is kown for copy pasting. The entire page the content is copy pasted from the sources. The remaining has no source. He also sourced the persons own books and and own website. The image is also stolen from facebook. Nearly everything is copied from www.organiser.org/Encyc/2020/7/22/Karuppar-Kottam-controversy-in-Tamil-Nadu-exposes-DMKs-Hindu-hatred.html 2409:4072:508:DEC2:BDEC:9BD5:6AC5:A91B (talk) 18:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned the article. Thank you for the report.— Diannaa (talk) 01:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again this guy is copying paragraphs from the sources Draft:Tamil Nadu Startup. 2409:4072:508:DEC2:1B33:96F1:7A08:52AC (talk) 06:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the draft and given a final warning.— Diannaa (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like he is paid editing for a new phone. Look at the section User:Cyzkumar responded in teahouse. 2409:4072:639B:EA7D:BA32:617:B9E3:F629 (talk) 18:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, I just wanted to let you know that very little of the content in Volcanism on the Moon was copied from Moon. The only content I copied from there was on 5 January and is in the "Recent activity" section. I have since given attribution to the proper articles. Volcanoguy 03:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:KingBaudoin

Hello, Diannaa,

This editor has a historical speech on their user page which admin The Earwig deleted as they judged it to be infringing copyright but the editor disputes this conclusion. As our resident expert on copyright, I think your opinion on this would be helpful if you had a spare moment. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's obvious that it's a quotation, so it's not a violation of copyright. But it's an inappropriate use of the user page in my opinion, but I'm not sure if it qualifies for U5 speedy deletion. MFD might be the way to go.— Diannaa (talk) 23:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Diannaa. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 01:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

BilCat (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, as always. BilCat (talk) 04:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted my content

You deleted content on my DreamAhead College Investment Plan page, citing copyright. I have made some additions to your revised draft for your review. None of the text is copied or reused, and all statements are cited. thanks RodgerWA529 (talk) 20:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned your draft again. There was still a lot of copying. — Diannaa (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, some of the content you deleted this time, you had left in the previous draft. I've added important content back in to the overview area (your edit left it incomplete) and added a re-written description of the investment options.RodgerWA529 (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Copyright violations § Huge quotes in citations

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Copyright violations § Huge quotes in citations. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Hi Diannaa. Would mind taking a look at this? Perhaps you can help sort things out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commented— Diannaa (talk) 11:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Diannaa. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Laurier (talk) 06:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(It's about a privacy violation, so it's fairly urgent; thanx in advance.)

Reverted edit

You reverted my entire edit to an article instead of the supposedly offending section. I would like to draw your attention to the following: Revert only when necessary. Reverting tends to be hostile, making editing Wikipedia unpleasant. Good reasons to revert include vandalism.

My edit did not constitute vandalism. Please think more carefully before you perform the same action again.

Thank you. Djp.mortimer (talk) 15:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Djp.mortimer: I did not remove your edit. Someone else removed it. I did remove the edit from the page history though; that was done because you added copyright content copied from https://www.historytoday.com/shot-through-eye-and-who%E2%80%99s-blame. Please don't add copyright text to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 15:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa:

That website does not own the copyright to the content, it is an extract from a book, which I fully sourced and referenced within the edit.

Djp.mortimer (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from a book is not allowed either, whether you include a citation or not.— Diannaa (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input on my edit

Hi DIannaa, thank you for the input on my edit on the Information Technology Act 2000 page. Will keep your comments in mind the next time i make any edits.

0x3456e00b (talk) 15:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021

I tried to give 2021 a good start by updating the QAI project topics. Please check and correct, - not a member, but an old friend! - For moar private "happy new year" see here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gerda! Happy New Year. Thursday, January 7 is Orthodox Christmas Day 2021 in Ukraine, so Merry Christmas, too.— Diannaa (talk) 20:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Main page informs us today about Little Christmas, - we call it Dreikönig (Three Kings), and you may have seen in the moar private link that I had great musical experiences listening to cantata services at a church of that name. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Inheritance

Hi! You wrote a message in my User Talk page with the title "Copyright problem on Inheritance" about an edition I made. First of all I want to apologize for this inconvenient as I'm not able yet to recognize these cases. You said "While the original document is public domain, the translation is not." so I was thinking that if we change the cite for one that has the original document there should not be any problem while we don't keep the content literally equal to the one of the page from where I copy this content. If not, I think we can ask for a traslation in ru.wikipedia but I don't know how it is done.

Angel Millo (talk) 23:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the citation does not mean we are at liberty to make a copy of someone's copyright material. I hope that's not what you meant? We need to make our own translation, not just copy one from elsewhere. Using a Google translation is not allowed either.— Diannaa (talk) 00:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Material- Carrollton High School (Carrollton, Georgia)

Hello Diannaa! I apologise for the issues with the aforementioned page. As you can see I am still inexperienced at editing and am trying to improve. I will work to find sourced material for the page and not simply use other material. Thank you for you input!

EmperorKen (talk) 00:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reckless Removal on Your Part

Dear Admin with all due to respect you removed hours of my work in Pashto Grammar which I added and edited from three different grammar books (whose references were added in Further Reading I might add]. Please note I am re-adding the information again spending hours of my time for the benefit of wikipedia; please note this time: 1. I am adding references 2. I am changing words 3. I am adding my own words 4. I am changing structure of organisation So that the info can not be removed on copyright issues.

If you had just asked me in my talk page i would have gladly re-edited the page - instead in you removed it within one second which is taking me hours to re-add. P

PashtoAdder4 (talk) 11:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)][reply]

If you still have a problem with a sentence please remove that specific section and let me know - not the whole. I have put alot of my own examples in as well. It takes hours changing keyboards between english, pashto and ipa. PashtoAdder4 (talk) 13:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The content you added was copied for the most part from https://pt.scribd.com/document/313466504/Descriptive-Grammer-Of-Pushto-pdf in October and again in January. (Click on the Ithenticate links to view the overlap). If you add content written in your own words, I won't have to remove it.— Diannaa (talk) 13:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am adding it in my own words and referencing - my comments in each edit summary are now given. Please also compare the versions from the three grammar books i have used=

1. https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=wS7nBQAAQBAJ&source=gbs_book_other_versions

2. https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=KToHywAACAAJ&dq=pashto+grammar&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjus7Phw4zuAhWUXsAKHQA5AhEQ6AEwAHoECAIQAg

3. https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=bQGVvQEACAAJ&dq=pashto+grammar+tegey&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiiq4Huw4zuAhWTmFwKHfAMBI4Q6AEwAXoECAAQAQ

PashtoAdder4 (talk) 14:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out the new edits PashtoAdder4 (talk) 14:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ye So-ya

Hi greeting! I'm creator of Draft:Ye So-ya. You allegedly removed some content in this article as copyvio. This was not a copyvio and came from the 2007 version of Jumong article, see that page's edit history here. The website copied the whole article is dated 2007. I'm sure this is most likely a WP:MIRROR. I'm sorry, I forgot to put (WP:CWW) in the page's edit summary. Please kindly restore content that you removed in the article. Thanks 136.228.175.16 (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zafarnama_(letter)

[2] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guru_Gobind_Singh

[3] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurangzeb

[4] ttps://archive.org/details/ZafarnamaWithMeanings

[5] ttp://www.panjabdigilib.org/webuser/searches/displayPage.jsp?ID=369&page=1&CategoryID=3&Searched=

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

Talk page archive
Send me no flowers
List Archive 1 Nov 2009–June 2010 Archive 2 July–October 2010 Archive 3 October–Nov 2010 Archive 4 November 2010 Archive 5 December 2010 Archive 6 January–Feb 2011 Archive 7 Feb–March 2011 Archive 8 March–April 2011 Archive 9 April–May 2011 Archive 10 May–June 2011 Archive 11 June–July 2011 Archive 12 July–August 2011 Archive 13 August–Oct 2011 Archive 14 October–Dec 2011 Archive 15 Jan–Feb 2012 Archive 16 Feb–March 2012 Archive 17 April 2012 Archive 18 May–June 2012 Archive 19 June–July 2012 Archive 20 July 2012 Archive 21 August–September 2012 Archive 22 September–October 2012 Archive 23 November 2012 Archive 24 December 2012 Archive 25 January 2013 Archive 26 February–March 2013 Archive 27 April–May 2013 Archive 28 June–July 2013 Archive 29 August–September 2013 Archive 30 October–December 2013 Archive 31 January–February 2014 Archive 32 March–April 2014 Archive 33 May–June 2014 Archive 34 July–August 2014 Archive 35 September–October 2014 Archive 36 November–December 2014 Archive 37 January–February 2015 Archive 38 March 2015 Archive 39 April–May 2015 Archive 40 June–July 2015 Archive 41 August–September 2015 Archive 42 October–November 2015 Archive 43 December 2015 Archive 44 January–February 2016 Archive 45 March–April 2016 Archive 46 May–June 2016 Archive 47 July–August 2016 Archive 48 September–October 2016 Archive 49 November–December 2016 Archive 50 January–February 2017 Archive 51 March–April 2017 Archive 52 May–June 2017 Archive 53 July–August 2017 Archive 54 September–October 2017 Archive 55 November–December 2017 Archive 56 January–February 2018 Archive 57 March–April 2018 Archive 58 May–June 2018 Archive 59 July–August 2018 Archive 60 September–October 2018 Archive 61 November–December 2018 Archive 62 January–February 2019 Archive 63 March–April 2019 Archive 64 May–June 2019 Archive 65 July–August 2019 Archive 66 September–October 2019 Archive 67 November–December 2019 Archive 68 January–February 2020 Archive 69 March–April 2020 Archive 70 May–June 2020 Archive 71 July–August 2020 Archive 72 September–October 2020 Archive 73 November–December 2020 Archive 74 January–February 2021 Archive 75 March–April 2021 Archive 76 May–June 2021 Archive 77 July–August 2021 Archive 78 September–October 2021 Archive 79 November–December 2021 Archive 80 January–February 2022 Archive 81 March–April 2022 Archive 82 May–June 2022 Archive 83 July–August 2022 Archive 84 September–October 2022 Archive 85 November–December 2022 Archive 86 January–February 2023 Archive 87 March–April 2023 Archive 88 May–June 2023 Archive 89 July–August 2023 Archive 90 September–October 2023 Archive 91 November–December 2023 Archive 92 January–February 2024 Archive 93 March–April 2024 Archive 94 May–June 2024 Archive 95 July–August 2024 Archive 96 September–October 2024 Archive 97 November–December 2024