User talk:Sonic Punch Revival

Welcome!

Hi Sonic Punch Revival! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Megaman en m (talk) 16:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Dreamy Jazz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Deltarune, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -GoatLordServant^{(Talk-Contribs)} 13:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shrek Retold, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 14:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Shrek Retold has been reverted.
Your edit here to Shrek Retold was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/shrek2retold?lang=en, https://twitter.com/the3gi) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Deltarune. -GoatLordServant^{(Talk-Contribs)} 13:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Sonic Punch Revival, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. -GoatLordServant^{(Talk-Contribs)} 16:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Undertale. You continue to use unreliable sources to make large additions, and on top of that, have edit warred at Undertale with editors who undo your inappropriate edits. The next time will be a block. -- ferret (talk) 13:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Papyrus Confused.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Papyrus Confused.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Papyrus (character), from its old location at User:Sonic Punch Revival/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. SK2242 (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papyrus (character) (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Every source needs to be replaced. Wikis and most YouTube channels and Twitter accounts are self published and unreliable. See WP:RS, WP:RSP and WP:SPS for more info.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Papyrus (character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Papyrus (character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 15:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sonic Punch Revival! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SK2242 (talk) 15:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papyrus (character) (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement in sourcing. It is still pointing to IGN wikias and user-generated sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Papyrus (character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Papyrus (character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Why did you think Papyrus (Character) was ready for mainspace after the draft was declined twice at AfC? I strongly urge you to request deletion of the article and continue working on the draft. SK2242 (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Papyrus (Character). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. SK2242 (talk) 21:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sonic Punch Revival

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Sonic Punch Revival, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RationalPuff (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Papyrus (Character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Papyrus (Character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papyrus (Character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

// Timothy :: talk 01:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is a stupid reason of deleting the Papyrus (Character) Page, I only put Disbelief Papyrus on the other media section because it's popular for the Undertale Fandom and that Wikipedia has articles on fan projects as well and even promoted loads of them on different pages like Super Mario 64 and Sonic 2 for example. Sonic Punch Revival (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When a draft you created is declined twice, creating an identical version in article space is disruptive. SK2242 (talk) 00:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well I thought If I upload it to Wikipedia as an actual page, the page would get impoved and besides Papyrus is an incredibly popular Undertale Character so it makes sense in fact he's more popular than Toriel and Flowey Sonic Punch Revival (talk) 00:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papyrus (Undertale) (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Major parts of this cannot be left in an unsourced state. If you cannot find a reliable source for information it should be removed from the draft. There is also the question of whether this meets notability requirements (does not appear to).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Papyrus (Undertale) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Papyrus (Undertale), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 00:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Papyrus Confused.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Papyrus Confused.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Unofficial Undertale Media (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarioJump83 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of these works came from Tumblr or DeviantArt which is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Unofficial Undertale Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Unofficial Undertale Media, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mario Jump 83! 07:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Unofficial Undertale Media (February 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There's nothing to suggest that these are notable. To establish notability what you need are things like coverage of the fan work in independent, reliable sources like newspaper articles and similar. See WP:VG/RS for what is considered to be a reliable source on Wikipedia.

To be honest, most fan works aren't going to be notable enough to warrant even a mention on Wikipedia. They may be popular, but popularity doesn't make something notable - it just makes it more likely that coverage might exist. For example, the fan fiction (or possibly a mock fan fiction) My Immortal is now independently notable of the Harry Potter franchise but initially it wasn't, even though it was extremely well known. Wikipedia isn't meant to be a list of fan works - the best outlet for this would be an Undertale specific wiki.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well there are Wikipedia articles on Unofficial Mario and Sonic Media believe or not, I think that since Undertale is popular enough to have 4 articles on it, it can have an unofficial media page considering how much fan work there is for it. Sonic Punch Revival (talk) 09:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No it can’t, because you have failed to show any significant coverage of this subject from reputable sources. SK2242 (talk) 11:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well they were the only sources I could find Sonic Punch Revival (talk) 12:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which is a cardinal sign that something isn't notable, have you read WP:RS, WP:RSP and WP:SPS yet? -GoatLordServant^{(Talk-Contribs)} 12:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Friday Night Funkin (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hellknowz was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove unreferenced/uncited content, unreliable sources (Reddit) and extended content supported only by WP:PRIMARY sources. In particular, the "Characters" section is overly detailed and contains content not in the given references (WP:OR, WP:SYNTH). Reception section needs to be fixed. Additional sources such as mentioned before would be preferable, although I think the 3 sources likely push this past the WP:GNG bar.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Friday Night Funkin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Friday Night Funkin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Papyrus (Undertale) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Papyrus (Undertale). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 12:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me but I can’t find the comment for the article I created can you link me to it Sonic Punch Revival (talk) 12:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papyrus (Undertale) (February 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SK2242 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I have looked for significant coverage myself and cannot find any. You have already been told that most YouTube videos aren’t reliable. Your draft will not be considered further.

SK2242 (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 13:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Pico DX.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pico DX.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Unofficial Undertale Media moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Unofficial Undertale Media, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 23:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Pico DX.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pico DX.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pico DX.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pico DX.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pico's School (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pico's School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pico's School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:48, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Friday Night Funkin' - List of characters

Your additions to Friday Night Funkin' have been once again reverted. Despite clearly stating my reason that the characters section violates WP:VGSCOPE, no. 6 - "Lists of characters lacking secondary sourcing", you have since reinserted your additions 3 times now, without any reason more than just a generic "important" reason. A list of video game characters is not appropriate unless it can be covered by reliable sources - user-generated content, including YouTube, Twitch, Itch.io, and Newgrounds are not.

If you once again reinsert this content in any way without addressing the issues, I'll raise this issue up over at WT:VG. I can see that you have been previously blocked by Ferret for more or less the same reasons - persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, and even been warned numerous times by many users as seen above. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive issues around unsourced content and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 17:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Sonic Punch Revival (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked because I have improved my article editting and didn't know that my last edit was sourced properly, next time when I edit something for Wikipedia, I will use better sources here Sonic Punch Revival (talk) 18:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I want to be unblocked because I have improved my article editting and didn't know that my last edit was sourced properly, next time when I edit something for Wikipedia, I will use better sources here [[User:Sonic Punch Revival|Sonic Punch Revival]] ([[User talk:Sonic Punch Revival#top|talk]]) 18:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to be unblocked because I have improved my article editting and didn't know that my last edit was sourced properly, next time when I edit something for Wikipedia, I will use better sources here [[User:Sonic Punch Revival|Sonic Punch Revival]] ([[User talk:Sonic Punch Revival#top|talk]]) 18:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to be unblocked because I have improved my article editting and didn't know that my last edit was sourced properly, next time when I edit something for Wikipedia, I will use better sources here [[User:Sonic Punch Revival|Sonic Punch Revival]] ([[User talk:Sonic Punch Revival#top|talk]]) 18:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}