Jump to content

User talk:10mmsocket

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fatma Ataallah (talk | contribs) at 14:47, 18 September 2021 (Note). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

MicroImages, Inc.

This article has concerned me for some time, and you reminded me today via your prod to look into it again. There's further related articles all linked to the parent you've prodded, being TNTmips and TNTlite. I suspect all 3 of them are long standing non-notable spam. I've listed the latter 2 at AfD. -- Longhair\talk 09:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll take a look at the two AfD's and support as appropriate. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu Diet

Please be more specific concerning the WP:NOR you claim I inserted ? thanks BLPcleaner (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note

How come you did not look at the source I wrote in the edit?

http://todor66.com/

http://todor66.com/volleyball/Asia/index_Men.html

http://todor66.com/handball/Asia/index_Women.html

also see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Routine_calculations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungary_men%27s_national_handball_team#Competitive_record

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatma Ataallah (talkcontribs) 15:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Routine arithmetic is fine - but only when there are sources for the data. You just added what could be random data and large empty tables to articles? You are clearly an experienced editor with a newly-registered account so you must understand the need to provide reliable sourced WP:RS, not blogs or fansites. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sources should be properly referenced, not just added into an article as a bare URL or added as part of the edit summary. They must be part of the content. Futhermore sources should be reliable WP:RS. todor66.com is a fansite written by an individual, not a noted authority, not a noted publication, not an official source such as a sports authority. It's just stuff added onto the Internet by some well-meaning enthusiast. --10mmsocket (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

dear user , This site is the largest site for team sports results. I saw that it was also used in dozens of Wikipedia articles.